H-1B worker faces 10 years in prison for creating logic bomb attack on former employer Fannie Mae IT systems
VIA http://www.thetechherald.com
“Rajendrasinh Babubha Makwana, a Fannie Mae contractor indicted earlier this year for creating a logic bomb after being terminated from his job, was found guilty this week by a federal jury in Maryland. The initial indictment raised several issues, including calls to examine the H1B Visa program, but the real problem was policy failure.
During the Makwana indictment, the court said that if the logic bomb had been successful, it would have “caused millions of dollars of damage and reduced if not shutdown operations at [Fannie Mae] for at least one week.”
…
Makwana now faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz has scheduled sentencing for December 8, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.”
Amendments on H1B and L1 visas blocked
Information on the new USCIS Fee Increase
Introduction
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced a final rule adjusting fees for immigration applications and petitions. The final rule follows a period of public comment on a proposed version of the rule, which USCIS published in the Federal Register on June 11, 2010. After encouraging stakeholders to share their input, USCIS considered all 225 comments received. The final rule will increase overall fees by a weighted average of about 10 percent but will not increase the fee for the naturalization application. The rule will also reduce fees for six individual applications and petitions and will expand the availability of fee waivers to new categories. The final rule will be published in the Federal Register September 24, and the adjusted fees will go into effect on November 23, 2010.
USCIS is a primarily fee-based organization with about 90 percent of its budget coming from fees paid by applicants and petitioners for immigration benefits. The law requires USCIS to conduct fee reviews every two years to determine whether it is recovering its costs to administer the nation’s immigration laws, process applications, and provide the infrastructure needed to support those activities. Remaining funds come from appropriations provided annually by Congress. The final fee rule concludes a comprehensive fee review begun in 2009.
USCIS’s Fee-based Budget
Fees account for approximately $2.4 billion of USCIS’s $2.8 billion budget request for fiscal year (FY) 2011. More than two-thirds of the budget supports the adjudication of applications and petitions for immigration benefits at USCIS field offices, service centers, customer service call centers and records facilities. The remainder supports USCIS business transformation efforts and the funding of headquarters program offices.
The adjudication areas supported by fees include the following:
- Family-based petitions – facilitating the process for close relatives to immigrate, gain permanent residency, travel and work;
- Employment-based petitions – facilitating the process for current and prospective employees to immigrate to or stay in the U.S. temporarily;
- Asylum and refugee processing – adjudicating asylum and processing refugees;
- Naturalization – adjudicating eligibility for U.S. citizenship;
- Special status programs – adjudicating eligibility for U.S. immigration status as a form of humanitarian aid to foreign nationals; and
- Document issuance and renewal – verifying eligibility for, producing and issuing immigration documents.
USCIS’s fee revenue in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 was much lower than projected, and fee revenue in fiscal year 2010 remains low. While USCIS did receive appropriations from Congress and made budget cuts of approximately $160 million, this has not bridged the remaining gap between costs and anticipated revenue. A fee adjustment, as detailed in the final rule, is necessary to ensure USCIS recovers the costs of its operations while also meeting the application processing goals identified in the 2007 fee rule.
Highlights of the 2010 Final Fee Rule
The final fee rule will increase the average application and petition fees by approximately 10 percent. In recognition of the unique importance of naturalization, the final fee rule contains no increase in the naturalization application fee.
The final fee rule establishes three new fees for:
- Regional center designation under the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program (EB-5);
- Individuals seeking civil surgeon designation (with an exemption for certain physicians who examine service members, veterans, and their families at U.S. government facilities); and
- Recovery of the USCIS cost of processing immigrant visas granted by the Department of State.
The final fee rule adjusts fees for the premium processing service. This adjustment will ensure that USCIS can continue to modernize as an efficient and effective organization.
The final fee rule reduces fees for six individual applications and petitions:
- Petition for Alien Fiancé (Form I-129F);
- Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-539);
- Application to Adjust Status from Temporary to Permanent Resident (Form I-698);
- Application for Family Unity Benefits (Form I-817);
- Application for Replacement Naturalization/Citizenship Document (Form N-565); and
- Application for Travel Document (Form I-131), when filed for Refugee Travel Document.
The final fee rule eliminates two citizenship-related fees for those service members and veterans of the U.S. armed forces who are eligible to file an Application for Naturalization (Form N-400) with no fee:
- Request for Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings (Form N-336); and
- Application for Certificate of Citizenship (Form N-600).
Lastly, the final fee rule expands the availability of fee waivers to new categories, including:
- Individuals seeking humanitarian parole under an Application for Travel Document (Form I-131);
- Individuals with any benefit request under the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008; and
- Individuals filing a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) following a denial of any application or petition that did not initially require a fee.
Final Rule: Schedule of Fees
The following schedule lists the adjusted fees that will take effect on November 23, 2010, alongside the existing fees in effect until that date:
|
Form No. |
Application/Petition Description |
Existing Fees (effective through Nov. 22, 2010 |
Adjusted Fees (effective beginning Nov. 23, 2010) |
| I-90 | Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card | $290 | $365 |
| I-102 | Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document | $320 | $330 |
| I-129/129CW | Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker | $320 | $325 |
| I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiancé(e) | $455 | $340 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | $355 | $420 |
| I-131 | Application for Travel Document | $305 | $360 |
| I-140 | Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker | $475 | $580 |
| I-191 | Application for Advance Permission to Return to Unrelinquished Domicile | $545 | $585 |
| I-192 | Application for Advance Permission to Enter as Nonimmigrant | $545 | $585 |
| I-193 | Application for Waiver of Passport and/or Visa | $545 | $585 |
| I-212 | Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the U.S. after Deportation or Removal | $545 | $585 |
| I-290B | Notice of Appeal or Motion | $585 | $630 |
| I-360 | Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant | $375 | $405 |
| I-485 | Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status | $930 | $985 |
| I-526 | Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur | $1,435 | $1,500 |
| I-539 | Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status | $300 | $290 |
|
I-600/600A I-800/800A |
Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative/Application for Advance Processing of Orphan Petition | $670 | $720 |
| I-601 | Application for Waiver of Ground of Excludability | $545 | $585 |
| I-612 | Application for Waiver of the Foreign Residence Requirement | $545 | $585 |
| I-687 | Application for Status as a Temporary Resident under Sections 245A or 210 of the Immigration and Nationality Act | $710 | $1,130 |
| I-690 | Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility | $185 | $200 |
| I-694 | Notice of Appeal of Decision under Sections 245A or 210 of the Immigration and Nationality Act | $545 | $755 |
| I-698 | Application to Adjust Status from Temporary to Permanent Resident (Under Section 245A of Public Law 99-603) | $1,370 | $1,020 |
| I-751 | Petition to Remove the Conditions of Residence | $465 | $505 |
| I-765 | Application for Employment Authorization | $340 | $380 |
| I-817 | Application for Family Unity Benefits | $440 | $435 |
| I-824 | Application for Action on an Approved Application or Petition | $340 | $405 |
| I-829 | Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions | $2,850 | $3,750 |
| I-881 | Application for Suspension of Deportation or Special Rule Cancellation of Removal (Pursuant to Section 203 of Public Law 105–110) | $285 | $285 |
| I-907 | Request for Premium Processing Service | $1,000 | $1,225 |
| Civil Surgeon Designation | $0 | $615 | |
| I-924 | Application for Regional Center under the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program | $0 | $6,230 |
| N-300 | Application to File Declaration of Intention | $235 | $250 |
| N-336 | Request for Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings | $605 | $650 |
| N-400 | Application for Naturalization | $595 | $595 |
| N-470 | Application to Preserve Residence for Naturalization Purposes | $305 | $330 |
| N-565 | Application for Replacement Naturalization/Citizenship Document | $380 | $345 |
| N-600/600K | Application for Certification of Citizenship/ Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate under Section 322 | $460 | $600 |
| Immigrant | $0 | $165 | |
| Biometrics | Capturing, Processing, and Storing Biometric Information | $80 | $85 |
Last updated:09/23/2010
Senate Blocks Action on Defense Bill and DREAM Act
VIA AILA
H-1B Recruiting Companies Sue USCIS, DHS over Changes
Eweek.com reports that H-1B recruiting firms have filed suit against USCIS, DHS over changes to the H-1B presumably related to the Neufeld Memo. The companies indicate that the government is overstepping its mandate and burdening these specialists with an intrusive and costly ruling that they estimate will cost more than $100 million.
USCIS To Issue Redesigned Green CardFact Sheet
VIA USCIS
Introduction
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that it has redesigned the Permanent Resident Card – commonly known as the “Green Card” – to incorporate several major new security features. State-of-the-art technology prevents counterfeiting, obstructs tampering, and facilitates quick and accurate authentication of the card. Beginning today, USCIS will issue all Green Cards in the new, more secure format.
Card Features
| Front of Card | Previous | New |
| Optical Variable Ink |
X |
|
| Holographic Image |
X |
X |
| Embedded Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFD) |
X |
|
| Laser Engraved Fingerprint |
X |
|
| Unique Background Design |
|
X |
| Back of Card | ||
| Optical Media Stores All Digital Files, Including Biometrics |
X |
X |
| Micro-image, High Resolution Pictures of State Flags and Presidents |
X |
X |
Features of note:
- USCIS number is now listed on the front of the card. The alien registration number is listed on the back of the redesigned Green Card (i.e., A# 000-000-000).
- Redesign results from extensive collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Screening Coordination Office, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Forensic Document Laboratory, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
- Special ink creates color shifts in visual designs (e.g., eagle’s head).
- Fine-lined artwork and complex architecture incorporate patterns that are nearly impossible to reproduce.
- Standard card design and personalized features are integrated to deter fraud attempts, e.g., alteration of the photograph.
- Greater detail in photograph makes for easier identification of the bearer.
- Ultra-violet technology and tactile clues allow accurate card authentication at border crossings.
- Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) allows inspectors to read unique, 192-bit serial number (192-bits) from a distance and link the information to the personal data on file.
- Personalized return address on back of card doubles as security feature and as customer-service enhancement to facilitate easy return of lost cards to USCIS.
- In keeping with its nickname, redesigned Permanent Resident Card is now green.
Last updated:05/26/2010
AILA Memo to USCIS regarding the Neufeld Memo
Pune Mirror story on the Neufeld Memo
I was recently interviewed by the Pune Mirror for a story on H-1B visas.
Separate and New Immigration Courts advocated by Lawyers
02/08/2010
VIA NY Times
The American Bar Association called for an overhaul of the US Immigration Court system, citing immense backlogs and an “an overwhelmed system choked by an exploding caseload”
Read article
USCIS Issues Additional Information Regarding the Employ American Workers Act (EAWA) to Employers Filing H-1B Petitions
VIA USCIS.org
WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today provides additional guidance regarding the Employ American Workers Act (EAWA) to employers seeking to file H-1B petitions.
The EAWA was enacted to ensure that companies that receive funding under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) or section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act do not displace U.S. workers. Under this legislation, any company that has received covered funding and seeks to hire new H-1B workers is considered an “H-1B dependent employer.” An H-1B dependent employer must make
additional statements to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regarding the recruitment and non-displacement of U.S. workers when filing a Labor Condition Application (LCA). Please refer to the DOL’s Web site for guidance regarding the LCA filing requirements.
Subsequent to the enactment of EAWA, USCIS revised its Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, to include a question asking whether the employer received covered funding (Question A.1.d). See the first page of the H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement. Question A.1.d. is meant to identify petitioners who received funding under TARP or section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act when the petition is filed.
USCIS understands that some businesses who received covered funding may have subsequently repaid their obligations and may not know how to respond to Question A.1.d. (For information on whether covered funding obligations have been repaid, recipients of TARP funding should seek guidance from the Department of Treasury, or the Federal Reserve, respectively.) If you have repaid
your obligations, then answer “No” to Question A.1.d. If you wish to provide further information with the petition to assist USCIS in determining that your status for purposes of EAWA is correct, you may do so.
USCIS reminds you that a valid LCA must be on file with DOL when the H-1B petition (with a copy of the LCA) is filed with USCIS. Processing delays or a denial of the H-1B petition may result if the LCA does not correspond with Question A.1.d of the H-1B petition, unless any inconsistency is explained to the satisfaction of USCIS. For example, if the LCA includes the additional statements, but Question A.1.d is answered “no,” you can explain that you had received covered funding at the time of filing the LCA but repaid the obligation before filing the Form I-129. However, please note that if you indicate on the petition that you are subject to the EAWA, but the LCA does not contain the proper declarations relating to H-1B dependent employers, USCIS will deny the H-1B petition.
USCIS additionally reminds employers that EAWA applies only to new hires and not to H-1B petitions seeking to change the status of a beneficiary working for the petitioning employer in another work-authorized category. It also does not apply to H-1B petitions seeking an extension of H-1B status for a current employee to continue working for the same employer.
Last updated:02/04/2010
Problems with H-1B Admissions at Newark, NJ Airport
VIA AILA.org
The AILA U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Liaison Committee received reports from AILA members that CBP inspectors at the Newark, New Jersey airport port of entry were apparently assisting in an investigation involving certain H-1B nonimmigrants from India and certain H-1B petitioner companies. The inspectors’ questions focused on who the individuals worked for, how their pay was computed, who paid their salary, their job duties, and what they were paid. In some cases, the individuals were subjected to expedited removal and visa cancellation.
After inquiring with CBP headquarters (“HQ”) about these incidents, the CBP Liaison Committee was advised by HQ that several of these cases involved companies under investigation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and/or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for ongoing fraud. CBP HQ noted that they use as much advance information as possible to target specific individuals who warrant additional inspection. HQ also noted that recent enforcement cases reviewed ranged from simple documentary deficiency to visa/petition fraud. Upon an inadmissibility finding, the determination to either allow the applicant to withdraw his or her application for admission or to subject the applicant to expedited removal is based on “the totality of the circumstances and reviewed on a case by case basis.” In the Newark enforcement actions, CBP Newark worked closely with USCIS – Fraud Detection and National Security (“FDNS”) and the Department of Labor – Office of Investigations. CBP HQ stated that those questioned were offered the opportunity to contact their consulate and that CBP officers contacted the petitioner and/or current employer when clarification was needed. CBP HQ confirmed that they screen ALL employment-based visa holders to determine admissibility and ensure compliance with entry requirements.
In addition, on January 27, AILA members attending a CBP meeting in the Newark, New Jersey area were informed that a new policy has been instituted at Newark Airport. This policy involves conducting random checks for returning H-1B, L-1, and other employment-based visa holders. Based upon the initial check, if the person’s admissibility is questionable, then he or she will be sent to secondary inspection for further interview. In some cases, if CBP discovers discrepancies in previously filed petitions, then the applicant may be asked to withdraw his/her application for admission into the United States or be subject to expedited removal.
During that same local CBP meeting, attendees were advised that if CBP discovers that a returning Lawful Permanent Resident has a post-1998 conviction, the Lawful Permanent Resident may be detained. The Newark airport port of entry has adopted a mandatory detention policy for crimes that were committed after 1998. In the event that CBP cannot get a copy of the conviction record in twenty-four hours, the person may be released. The only exceptions are that CBP will release a Lawful Permanent Resident for humanitarian reasons; extenuating circumstances such as if the foreign national is traveling with children and there is no one to pick up the children; or when the person is a sole provider for United States Citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident children.
Individuals with pending I-751 petitions returning to the United States via the Newark airport port of entry, who have a I-751 filing receipt documenting that an I-751 has been properly filed or an ADIT Legal Permanent Resident stamp, will be sent to secondary inspection for further interview to verify the validity of the I-751 Petition. It is unclear if CBP will undertake a substantive review of the I-751 Petition.
In all cases, attorneys should remind their clients to thoroughly prepare for their trip to the United States and their inspection upon application for admission by reviewing all pertinent documents to their petition and to consider carrying evidence to support the assertions made in the petition filed on their behalf by their employer. Similarly, employers must be prepared for telephone inquiries from CBP officers at ports of entry to confirm the assertions made in any nonimmigrant petition and supporting documentation. Finally, employers must be advised that the government may review information in any public venues such as websites and other media for consistency with petition content. Thus, keeping such public information accurate and current is essential.
Note the new fraud related language added to I-797 approval notices –
NOTICE: Although this application/petition has been approved, DHS reserves the right to verify the information submitted in this application, petition, and/or supporting documentation to ensure conformity with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and other authorities. Methods used for verifying information may include, but are not limited to, the review of public information and records, contact by correspondence, the Internet, or telephone, and site inspections of businesses and residences. Information obtained during the course of verification will be used to determine whether revocation, rescission, and/or removal proceedings are appropriate. Applicants, petitioners, and representatives of record will be provided an opportunity to address derogatory information before any formal proceeding is initiated.

Ashwin Sharma interviewed by BBC News Radio on H-1B issues and the 2010 Neufeld Memo
Ashwin Sharma’s interview with BBC news about H-1B issues resulting from the Neufeld memo (Hindi Script)
Listen to interview: