Archive | General News RSS for this section

Hastert Deals Blow to Immigration Bill

Via Forbes.com

Hopes for a quick compromise on immigration
were dealt a blow Tuesday after House Speaker Dennis Hastert said he
wanted to take a “long look” at a Senate bill offering possible
citizenship to millions of illegal immigrants.

Hastert said hearings on the Senate bill
should be held before appointing anyone to a House-Senate committee to
negotiate a compromise immigration bill. Later, he said he was unsure
what the House’s next move would be.



Continue reading

Army veteran with ailing son can stay on LI

BY BART JONES
Newsday Staff Writer

June 13, 2006

Single dad gets green card after long immigration battle over time spent out of U.S. to care for his son

A U.S. Army veteran from Farmingdale has won a long-sought green card,
avoiding deportation for a minor immigration law infraction he
committed unknowingly to stay with his son having critical heart
surgery in Germany, officials said.

David de Jong, 30, obtained legal permanent resident status after
Rep. Tim Bishop (D-Southampton) and other officials intervened, saying
it was an outrage a veteran would be deported for a minor infraction of
immigration law and that they were inundated with petitions from
residents protesting his possible removal.

Continue reading

Immigration judge off bench while broader U.S. review continues

Via Phillyburbs.com

PHILADELPHIA – One U.S. immigration judge is
off the bench and others could follow in the wake of blistering federal
court rebukes about the treatment of asylum seekers.

Donald V.
Ferlise has been replaced on the court calendar in Philadelphia while
the U.S. attorney general conducts a nationwide review of immigration
judges, who decide who can stay in the United States to avoid turmoil
in their homelands.

Several of the
judges have been the subjects of angry appellate court rulings. In
Ferlise’s case, the increasingly strident 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals took aim at his demeanor.

“Yet once
again, under the ‘bullying’ nature of the immigration judge’s
questioning, a petitioner was ground to bits,” U.S. Circuit Judge
Maryanne Trump Barry wrote in a ruling this spring.

In rulings that
were overturned in recent years, Ferlise denied asylum to the nephew of
a deposed Gambian president, to a Pakistani woman whose father was
killed in sectarian violence and to a young Ghanian woman who said her
priest-father held her as a sex slave.

Ferlise denied
even the formality of a hearing for a Jordanian college student who
failed to register under a post-Sept. 11, 2001, program for men from
mostly Muslim countries, saying he had already decided the case.

Ferlise, 62,
did not return calls to his home and Philadelphia office this week. His
lawyer, Ralph Conte, said Ferlise remains employed by the Executive
Office of Immigration Review.

Local immigration lawyers say Ferlise stopped hearing cases a few weeks ago.

William Stock,
who heads the Philadelphia chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers
Association, said Ferlise was “deeply untrusting” of testimony from
asylum-seekers.

“He had a very
hard time finding a lot of people credible,” Stock said. “I think, too,
a lot of his decisions seemed to reflect that he had a very limited
experience of the world.”

The Justice
Department supervises about 215 immigration judges around the country
who oversee the nation’s teeming immigration courts. The department
called Ferlise’s job status a personnel matter and would not say if he
will return to the bench. The Executive Office of Immigration Review
also declined to say if other judges have been disciplined since
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales began a review this year.

Continue reading

USCIS Issues Memorandum on Eligibility for H-1B Cap Exemption Under American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC21)

Via AILA.org
June 8, 2006

USCIS Associate Director for Domestic Operations, Mike Aytes, issued a memorandum, dated June 6, 2006, providing guidance on eligibility for exemptions to the H-1B cap based on employment or an offer of employment at an institution of higher education, a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, a nonprofit research organization or a governmental research organization as provided by Section 103 of AC21.

With respect to the interpretation of the statutory language “employed (or
has received an offer of employment) at,” the memorandum clarifies that USCIS
will allow third-party petitioners — petitioners on behalf of an H-1B worker
who will work at a qualifying institution but is or will be employed by the
third-party petitioner — to claim exemption on behalf of a beneficiary,
provided the petitioner establishes a logical nexus between the work performed
predominantly by the beneficiary and the normal, primary or essential work
performed by the qualifying institution (higher education or nonprofit or
governmental research). The memorandum also provides guidance on the meaning of
the statutory phrases “institution of higher education or related or affiliated
nonprofit entity” and “nonprofit research organization or a governmental
research organization.”

A Post-Mortem On Fiscal 2007 H-1B Count

Via AILA.org

Questions are pouring in asking how it could be
that on May 25th USCIS indicated that there were as many as 12,000 H-1B
quota numbers available, and on May 26th, there were none. As of
Wednesday morning, June 1st, USCIS had just finished data-entering
cases that were received on May 25th, and began data-entering cases
received on May 26th. During the entry of May 26th cases, the cap was
reached, making it appear that 12,000 cases arrived overnight.

AILA has inquired into this oddity, and it appears that the problem
lies in the processing of filings by the USCIS at the VSC. When the
USCIS went to Bi-Specialization filing effective April 1, 2006, VSC was
unable to handle the volume of cases it was receiving, because all
I-129 case types were to be sent to the VSC, leading to data-entry and
receipting backlogs from early on. VSC data-entry and receipting
remained backlogged, leading to the lag between delivery of a petition
to VSC and its entry into the system. As USCIS updated its cap-count
reports, the volume of cases sent to VSC increased, further
contributing to the backlog in data-entry and receipting. The cap count
reports posted by USCIS failed to mention that not all cases received
had been input into the system, and that thus the counts did not
include all cases received as of the report dates. Ultimately, the
combination of the existing backlog in data entry and the volume of new
cases delivered last week made it appear that 12,000 cases arrived
overnight.

U.S. praises Canada on terror arrests but critics blast immigration laws

Via Canada.com

WASHINGTON (CP) – Canada’s sweeping anti-terror arrests constitute
high-profile proof the country’s “on the job” when it comes to
security, U.S. officials said Sunday as they praised cross-border
safety co-operation.

“It’s obviously a very great success for the Canadian
counterterrorism efforts, which we know have been very robust,” said
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. “They’re to be congratulated for
it.

“Really since Sept. 11, Canada has been very active in the war on terror.”

But the breakup of a so-called homegrown terror cell with a huge
cache of fertilizer used to make bombs also sparked renewed charges
that the border’s too porous and Canada’s become a haven for terrorists
because immigration laws are too lax.

Continue reading

Gay couple may be forced apart by US immigration laws

via pinknews.uk.co

A
Swansea woman and her American partner may have to give up their home
and life in the States, as US immigration laws fail to take gay
partnerships into account.

Belinda
Ryan, a helicopter pilot, has been living with her partner Wendy Daw,
an acupuncturist, in San Francisco. But she will be forced to return to
the UK unless there is a change in immigration laws for gay couples.

Currently
US law defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and
excludes same-sex couples from having the same rights. Though the
debate is raging in Washington, the couple fear that any change to the
law will come to late if it comes at all.

Continue reading

Cap Treatment of H-1B Petitions Delivered to VSC Prior to Cap Cut-Off But Not Yet Receipted

06/01/2006

USCIS has confirmed to AILA that any cap-subject H-1B received at the
VSC mailroom prior to the cut-off day will be considered under the cap
regardless of whether it was data entered. Any cap-subject H1-B
petition received on the cut-off day will be eligible for random
selection. USCIS also advised that as of close-of-business yesterday
VSC had data entered through 5/25.

Article: AILA on Reaching of H-1B Cap

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Thursday, June 1, 2006

CONTACT:
George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org

H-1B VISAS CAP REACHED

Once Again Arbitrary Cap is Damaging US Businesses Ability to Hire Global Talent

WASHINGTON DC, JUNE 1 – The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
(USCIS) announced today that it has met the 65,000 H-1B congressionally
mandated cap for the 2007 fiscal year, which means that companies that
need workers with critical skills will have to wait more than a year
before they can obtain this needed expertise. “This is unprecedented.
It marks the second year in a row that the H-1B cap has been
prematurely reached said Deborah J. Notkin, president of the American
Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). “It is another example of the
country’s broken immigration system and why we need Congress to pass
the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill which solves this annual
dilemma.”

“It’s just more bad news for American employers,” continued Notkin.
“The exhaustion of this fiscal year’s H-1B visas impedes growth and
innovation, and makes it more difficult for U.S. businesses to stay
competitive. Some employers are sending work overseas, because there
are not enough qualified Americans. A workable H-1B program with an
increased initial limit and flexibility to adjust the limit based on
economic conditions would give U.S. employers access to the talent they
need and help retain jobs in America diminishing the need for
off-shoring.”

The H-1B nonimmigrant visa category allows U.S. employers to augment
the existing labor force with highly skilled international workers,
such as research scientists, to provide expertise to American companies
for temporary periods. H-1B workers are admitted to the United States
for an initial period of three years, which may be extended for an
additional three years.

The H-1B visa is utilized by U.S. businesses and other organizations
to employ international workers in specialty occupations that require
specialized expertise. Typical H-1B occupations include scientists,
architects, engineers, systems analysts, accountants, doctors, and
college professors.

###AILA###

Founded in 1946, AILA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that
provides its Members with continuing legal education, information,
professional services and expertise. AILA advocates before Congress and
the Administration, as well as providing liaison with other government
agencies in support of pro-immigration initiatives. AILA is an
Affiliated Organization of the American Bar Association and is
represented in the ABA House of Delegates.

Accord on immigration reform seen as unlikely

Via heraldnet.com

The lead negotiator for the House says a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is a “nonstarter.”


WASHINGTON – The prime architect of the House’s hard-line bill on immigration policy expressed skepticism Friday about the chances of finding common ground with the Senate, saying he viewed the two chambers as “moons apart” on the issue.


House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., insisted that he was committed to trying to reach a compromise with the Senate.


“I would like to see a bill passed and signed into a law,” he said.


But he added: “However, I am a realist.”

Continue reading

US Senate approves doubling H-1B visas

Via Newindpress.com

WASHINGTON: The US Senate has approved a landmark immigration reform Bill that would give citizenship to millions of illegal persons and double the number of H1B visas from the present 65,000, a move that would greatly benefit thousands of Indian software professionals.

The Bill passed on Thursday provides for doubling the H-1B visas from the present 65,000 annually to about 115,000 and with a 20 per cent increase on an annual basis.

Various software and technology companies like Microsoft and Intel have been pressuring the US Government by threatening to move jobs abroad if it does not raise the cap on H-1B visas and allow more skilled workers into the country.

In the version that was cleared by the senate judiciary committee was also a new student visa classification for high tech studies.

However, the House version of the Bill has nothing on the H-1B visa and according to analysts it is most likely to be neglected when legislators get down to the negotiations at the conference committee stage.

The main provision of the bill is however to provide nearly 10 million to 12 million illegals living in the US citizenship rights that was denounced in many quarters as downright amnesty and something that House of Representatives has nothing to say when it passed the immigration legislation late last year.

Couple convicted of harboring maid

Via www.jsonline.com

They face up to 45 years in prison, deportation

By LISA SINK

Posted: May 26, 2006

A wealthy Brookfield couple face up to 45 years in prison, forfeiture of their home and deportation to their native Philippines after being the first convicted in eastern Wisconsin of imposing forced labor on an illegal immigrant they harbored as a maid for 19 years.


A federal jury deliberated about seven hours before finding Jefferson N. and Elnora Calimlim guilty of all four felony immigration charges filed against them, including what a prosecutor said may be the nation’s first forced labor conviction not involving use of violence.


Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracy Johnson hailed the convictions as a victory for protecting the civil rights of all people and preventing human trafficking.


“Holding somebody in involuntary servitude goes against the very nature and foundation of the United States,” Johnson said in an interview. “The Department of Justice is dedicated to preserving people’s rights, regardless of their status in life.”


Defense attorneys immediately vowed to appeal, saying the case was rife with issues because the forced labor charge was enacted in 2000 and largely untested in courts.


Prosecutors contended in trial that the Calimlims exploited and manipulated an uneducated woman from an impoverished family into thinking she had no choice but to work for them for long hours with minimal pay under harsh restrictions or face deportation.


Defense attorneys acknowledged that the family went to great lengths to keep her hidden in the home, but said that was done to protect her, not coerce her. They said the woman, Irma Martinez, agreed to the rules because she wanted to work for them rather than live in the Philippines.


The Calimlims’ son Jefferson M. Calimlim, 31, was found guilty of one felony for harboring an illegal immigrant but acquitted of two other charges. He faces a maximum five-year prison term when he and his parents are sentenced Sept. 15.


The parents each were convicted of harboring an illegal immigrant for financial gain, conspiracy to harbor an illegal immigrant, forced labor and attempted forced labor.


Because they are legal, permanent residents of the United States but citizens of the Philippines, the parents face “practically inevitable” deportation, Johnson told Chief Judge Rudolph T. Randa as she argued that the couple be jailed pending sentencing.


Deportation will be decided not by the judge but by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a branch of the Department of Homeland Security, Johnson said.


Johnson argued that the couple are a high flight risk because of their wealth and family connections to the Philippines, given the substantial prison time they faced.


She said they would be unable to fathom changing from “living from a life of privilege to living in a 10-by-13 cell.”


The husband is a practicing ear, nose and throat doctor; his wife is a licensed physician who stopped working in 1982.


Defense attorneys Tom Brown and Michael Fitzgerald objected to immediate incarceration, saying the two were professionals who would not want to be separated from their three U.S.-born children or the husband’s medical practice.


Government holds passports


Randa declined to jail the couple but said the government will continue to hold their passports.


The family declined to comment, as did Brown and Fitzgerald. Martinez, who is living in Chicago with federal assistance, was not in court when the verdicts were delivered.


Defense attorney Rodney Cubbie, representing the Calimlims’ son, argued that his client should never have been charged. He was not involved in hiring, paying or setting the terms of Martinez’s employment, which began when he was 11.


After graduating from college, Jeff Jr. was living at home when agents raided the family’s 8,600-square-foot home on Still Point Trail in September 2004 – acting on a tip from the estranged wife of another son, Jack Calimlim.


During the raid, Jeff Jr. lied to an FBI agent who quickly questioned the son as he was sitting on a bathroom toilet. The son said he hadn’t seen the maid in about a year, but the father showed agents where she was hiding in her basement bedroom closet. The jury acquitted the son of lying to the agent.


The eight-day trial included testimony from the maid and her parents, whom the federal government had flown to the United States and who lived in Chicago in preparation for the trial.


Defense attorneys focused their attacks on the forced labor charges, acknowledging that the couple did knowingly harbor an illegal immigrant.


They argued, however, that it was not done for financial gain – a required element of the crime. They said the couple, who live in a $1.2 million suburban Milwaukee home with tennis courts and a four-car garage, were not motivated by obtaining cheap labor as the prosecution contended.


They said the family was driven by their Filipino culture.


The couple were raised in well-off families, with the family trees dominated by generations of doctors and nurses. Elnora Calimlim said she and her five siblings each had their own nanny growing up and she was very close to her nanny, confiding in her like a mother.


Elnora’s father, a physician, was the one who found Irma Martinez and made arrangements for her to be his daughter’s housekeeper and help raise his grandchildren.


Susan French, a prosecutor with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights division in Washington, D.C., told jurors that the Calimlims’ stance that they wanted to help, not exploit, an impoverished Filipino woman was “bogus” and “preposterous.”


If they wanted to help her and her family, why didn’t they pay her a U.S. minimum wage? French asked.


Elnora Calimlim testified that Irma Martinez was paid $1,800 a year for the first 10 years and $4,800 a year thereafter.


Brown said those wages, while “peanuts” in the U.S., were worth much more in pesos to the Martinez family. With the wages, they bought a sturdier home, land to farm, farming tools, medicine and education for their children.