Archive | USCIS Guidelines and Announcements RSS for this section

FY2007 REGULAR H-1B CAP FILLED

06/01/2006

FY2007 REGULAR H-1B CAP FILLED

All regular H-1B applications received after May 26, 2006 will be rejected.

Current Cap Count for H-1B’s FY 2007 as of 05/25/2006










































 

Cap


Beneficiaries Approved


Beneficiaries Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total


Date of Last Count


H-1B


58,200 2


7,718


41,316


61,000


49,034


5/25/2006


H-1B Advance Degree Exemption


20,000


1,672


4,158


21,000


5,830


5/25/2006


H-1B (FY 06)


58,200


——


——


——


Cap Reached


8/10/2005


H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY 06)


20,000


——


——


——


Cap Reached


1/17/2006


 

Current H-1B Cap Count for Fiscal Year 2007 as of 05/23/2006

 

Cap

Beneficiaries Approved

Beneficiaries
Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total

Date of Last Count

H-1B

58,200 2

7,396

37,754

61,000

45,150

5/23/2006

H-1B Advance Degree
Exemption

20,000

1,611

3,944

21,000

5,555

5/23/2006

H-1B (FY 06)

58,200

——

——

——

Cap Reached

8/10/2005

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY
06)

20,000

——

——

——

Cap Reached

1/17/2006

Current H-1B Cap Count for Fiscal Year 2007 as of 05/19/2006

As of 05/19/2006











































 

Cap


Beneficiaries Approved


Beneficiaries Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total


Date of Last Count


H-1B


58,200 2


6,934


35,942


61,000


42,876


5/19/2006


H-1B Advance Degree Exemption


20,000


1,537


3,821


21,000


5,358


5/19/2006


H-1B (FY 06)


58,200


——


——


——


Cap Reached


8/10/2005


H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY 06)


20,000


——


——


——


Cap Reached


1/17/2006


1 Refers to the estimated numbers of beneficiary applications needed to reach the cap

H-1B Cap Count as of 5/12/2006

 

Cap

Beneficiaries Approved

Beneficiaries Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total

Date of Last Count

H-1B

58,200 2

6,033

28,775

61,000

34,808

5/12/2006

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption

20,000

1,392

3,246

21,000

4,638

5/12/2006

H-1B (FY 06)

58,200

——

——

——

Cap Reached

8/10/2005

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY 06)

20,000

——

——

——

Cap Reached

1/17/2006

1
Refers to the estimated numbers of beneficiary applications needed to
reach the cap, with an allowance for denials and revocations. Each
target is subject to revision later in the cap cycle as more petitions
are processed.
2 6,800 are
set aside for the H-1B1 program under terms of the U.S.-Chile and
U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Unused numbers in this pool can
first be made available for general use on October 1, 2006, the start
of FY 2007.

H-1B Cap Count as of 04/28/2006

H-1B Cap Count as of 04/28/2006

 

Cap

Beneficiaries Approved

Beneficiaries Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total

Date of Last Count

H-1B

58,200 2

4,507

12,230

61,000

16,737

4/28/2006

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption

20,000

1,007

1,877

21,000

2,884

4/28/2006

H-1B (FY 06)

58,200

——

——

——

Cap Reached

8/10/2005

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY 06)

20,000

——

——

——

Cap Reached

1/17/2006

1
Refers to the estimated numbers of beneficiary applications needed to
reach the cap, with an allowance for denials and revocations. Each
target is subject to revision later in the cap cycle as more petitions
are processed.
2 6,800 are
set aside for the H-1B1 program under terms of the U.S.-Chile and
U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Unused numbers in this pool can
first be made available for general use on October 1, 2006, the start
of FY 2007.

USCIS Notifies Employers of Delays in Issuing and Mailing of Receipt Notices for I-129s and I-140s

On April 27, 2006, USCIS issued a Public Notice providing details about its
delay in issuing and mailing receipt notices for Forms I-129 and I-140 filed in
early April 2006. Citing an “unusually large volume of receipts” at the Service
Centers during the first week of April, USCIS explained that it is taking longer
than expected to enter cases into the system. Depending on the type of case, it
may take USCIS up to two weeks to generate and mail receipt notices. USCIS
promised that, although the “Notice Date” will reflect the date the receipt
notice was actually generated, the original receipt date will be honored and
recorded on the receipt notice under “Received Date.” USCIS also stated that it
is addressing the problem and expects to be current by mid-May.

H-1B Cap Count as of 04/24/2006

H-1B Cap Count as of 04/24/2006
Via USCIS

 

Cap

Beneficiaries Approved

Beneficiaries Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total

Date of Last Count

H-1B

58,200 2

3,907

8,806

61,000

12,713

4/24/2006

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption

20,000

898

1,460

21,000

2,358

4/24/2006

H-1B (FY 06)

58,200

——

——

——

Cap Reached

8/10/2005

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY 06)

20,000

——

——

——

Cap Reached

1/17/2006

1
Refers to the estimated numbers of beneficiary applications needed to
reach the cap, with an allowance for denials and revocations. Each
target is subject to revision later in the cap cycle as more petitions
are processed.
2 6,800 are
set aside for the H-1B1 program under terms of the U.S.-Chile and
U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Unused numbers in this pool can
first be made available for general use on October 1, 2006, the start
of FY 2007.

Know Your Rights: Can an Employer Fire an Employee Because the Employee Participated in an Immigration Rally?

<a href="/files/4941-4844/Know_Your_Rights.pdf”>Know_Your_Rights: Can an Employer Fire an Employee Because the Employee Participated in an Immigration Rally?

Via AILA.org

Recently, people from across the country missed work to participate in immigration rallies. Unfortunately, a number of these individuals lost their jobs. These recent events have many wondering whether an employer can lawfully terminate an employee for missing work to attend an immigration rally. This pamphlet provides a general overview of the law. It is not intended to provide legal advice.

Employees have the right to join together in an attempt to improve their wages, hours and other employment conditions.

This right, however, does not permit employees to be late for work or to miss work. In most situations, an employer can fire an employee when the employee is absent without permission, even when the employee misses work to exercise her legal rights. Therefore, if an employee misses work to attend an immigration rally, an employer may be able to lawfully terminate the employee if the following conditions are met:
• The employee was hired at will. In other words, both the employer and the employee can terminate the relationship at any time for almost any reason
• At the time of the absence, the employer had an attendance policy in place
• Under the attendance policy, the employee’s absence is considered unexcused. These policies usually categorize an unexcused absence as any absence where an employer has not approved an employee’s request to use vacation, personal or sick leave. Employees should check their employer’s policy to determine what constitutes an unexcused absence
• The employer impartially granted employees’ requests to use their personal or vacation time, whether the employee requested time off to attend an immigration rally or for another reason
• The employer has a legitimate business reason for having an attendance policy
• The employer did not punish employees who missed work to attend the rallies more severely than other employees who had unexcused absences

How to Attend an Immigration Rally and Avoid Being Terminated

• Try to use your vacation or personal time Look at the attendance policy and determine how far in advance you need to request vacation or personal time. Keep in mind that your employer may limit the number of employees that can be absent on any particular day. Ask your employer whether their attendance policy limits the number of employees that can be absent on a particular day. If the policy does limit the number of employees that can be absent, then ask your employer how they determine which employees get the day off.
• Try to switch shifts or work extra shifts. If you cannot use vacation or personal time, ask your employer before the rally if you can be absent on the day of the rally in exchange for working extra shifts or switching shifts with another employee.
If your employer allows you to switch days or work extra shifts, have your employer put your agreement in writing. Then, if you do get terminated, you will have a record of your agreement.
• Review your employer’s sick leave policy. Most likely the policy will limit sick leave to instances when you or a family member is actually ill.
• Review your employer’s attendance policy. Specifically, review the consequences for an unexcused absence. Ask your employer what will happen if you miss work in order to attend the rally. Ask your employer to put his response in
writing. This will serve as a record in case you are terminated.
• Other options. If you are unable to take the day off, try to participate in the rally during your breaks or over your lunch hour.

What to Do If You Are Fired for Attending an Immigration Rally

• Stay calm. Do not panic or yell at your boss. Listen very carefully to what is being told to you. Calmly ask for some time to think about what has just been said, and to ask any questions you may have. If you are told to leave the job site immediately, ask for the name and phone number of the person you should call if you have any questions. Request an opportunity to gather your personal possessions, and leave. Be certain to collect any tools, property, or supplies you personally brought to the job
• Ask why you were fired. Even if you are an “at will” employee, you should ask the person firing you why you are being fired. If you receive only one reason for being fired, that might be the only reason your employer can give to a court or agency determining unemployment compensation or other benefits. Carefully record the exact reason you were given. Write down the name of the person who told you. Some states have laws that require employers to tell employees in writing why they are being fired. If the company fails to respond to your request, you may be able to sue your former employer. You typically cannot be fired just for participating in a political rally. However, if there are other valid reasons (you skipped work or left early with out permission, or you came in late), it may be more difficult to contest the decision.
• Ask who made the decision to fire you. Be sure you have the name of the person who actually had the ability to fire you, even if the person telling you that you are fired was your boss. If the person who had authority to fire you was not the person who supervised you, ask how the person with the ability to fire you made their decision, and who they spoke to about firing you. If the decision to fire you was based on someone else’s word, or other erroneous information, and you were not given an opportunity to defend yourself, you may be able to talk to the person who made the decision.
• Think carefully about what you were promised. If you are promised the entire day off or the time of the rally off, write down the time and place that promise was made, who made the promise and who witnessed it. At times, these promises can be considered binding contracts. If you ask your employer to reconsider a decision because of a promise that was made to you by a supervisor, your employer will need specific information about what was promised, and who promised it.
• Ask to see your personnel file. Not all states require employers to show terminated workers the contents of their personnel files. However, if you are able to view this file, it could contain favorable recommendations and comments that may protect you from getting bad recommendations as you look for a new job. If your performance record is poor, you may be barred from contesting your employer’s decision to fire you. If your employer refuses to let you see the contents of your file, ask for written confirmation that the file will not be shared with anyone else without your permission.
• If you signed a written employment contract, reread it. Look carefully at what it says about termination. If the company fails to act according to the contract, your rights may have been violated, and you may be entitled to payment. Also, carefully review your employment handbook, or company rules. While these are not always considered part of your employment contract, in certain cases they can be.
• Ask for your final paycheck. In most states, you are entitled to payment for all hours you have worked up to the time you are fired, and payment for unexpired vacation or sick leave time you have accrued, at the time you are fired. If your employer refuses, you may be able to sue for payment.
• Carefully review all documents before you sign them. Sometimes employers ask employees to sign a “release,” or a promise not to sue, in exchange for money. You are entitled to money you have already earned regardless of whether you sign a release or not. In fact, in most states, an employer is not allowed to use your last paycheck as a way to force you to sign a release. However, if you have already received your final paycheck, and an employer is offering you money in exchange for your signature,
be sure you understand what you are signing before you sign it.
• Return company property. Do not take any tools or supplies provided by your employer, and do not wait for your
employer to ask for you to return any items he or she provided to you. Things like automobile keys, tools, phones, and samples must be returned to avoid claims of theft, fraud, and breach of contract. When returning items by mail, get a receipt to prove delivery. When returning items in person, ask your employer to provide you with a signature stating that he or she has received the item. Remember that if you signed a paper to receive an item, you probably need to sign the same or another paper stating that you returned the item.
• Find out if you are eligible for unemployment benefits under state law. While undocumented workers are often barred from receiving benefits, you do not have to be a U.S. Citizen to claim unemployment. You can request a hearing if you feel benefits were unfairly denied.
• Find out what your employer intends to tell others about you. Many states have enacted anti-blacklisting statutes that punish employers for intentionally trying to prevent former employees from finding work. In some states, untruthful job references are treated as crimes. You may also be able to assert a lawsuit based on defamation and emotional distress if you discover that your employer is sharing confidential information with others.

If you find out your former employer is providing negative references to potential employers, send a letter, by certified mail, return receipt requested, informing your former employer of what you have learned and put the employer on notice of your desire to take prompt legal action if the problem persists.

• Find a lawyer you trust. If you are owed wages, vacation pay, or other compensation, or believe the employer violated the law or your contract, speak with an attorney. Many statutes offer attorneys’ fees if you prevail. Some attorneys take cases on a pro bono (for free) basis. Some attorneys may take a case on a contingency basis, which means you don’t have to pay them if you don’t win your case. All lawyers should be able to find someone who can translate into your language.

Every state has a state bar association that keeps a list of lawyers who accept referrals for various types of cases, and are willing to consult with you for a certain amount of time for a set fee. Other lawyers and lawyer organizations (often called bar associations) may be able to provide referrals.

Keep all your documents related to your employer together. You will need to keep any notes you write about what your employer has stated, and any documents your employer gives you, from the day you were hired, to the day you are fired, in a place where you can easily find them. This will help you or your attorney to provide quick and accurate information if you contest the decision, or if you are asked by a potential employer.

Can an Employer Re-Evaluate an Employee’s Immigration Status Because the Employee Participated in an Immigration Rally

In general, the answer is no. If an employer properly examined and verified an employee’s I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form, then an employer may not review the employee’s immigration status again except as described below.

An employer has properly examined and verified an employee’s I-9 form if the employer reviewed the eligibility and identification forms that accompanied the I-9. If the documents appear to be genuine, then an employer must accept the documents as true. Therefore, in most cases, an employer cannot re-evaluate an employee’s immigration status just because the employee participated in an immigration rally.

There are some exceptions that allow an employer to review an employee’s immigration status even after the employee is hired:

• Confession of fraudulent documents: If an employee confesses that their documents are fraudulent, then an employer is allowed to review their immigration status. The law requires the employer to immediately terminate the employee.
The employer has the right to rehire the employee if the employee submits a genuine I-9 form and documents proving employment eligibility and identification that are free of misrepresentation and fraud.
• Employer knows that employee is unauthorized to work: It is illegal for an employer, who knows that an employee is or has become an unauthorized alien, to continue their employment.
• The government can check an employee’s status: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, can investigate an employee’s immigration status at any time. If the government determines an employee is unlawfully employed, it can issue a warning or notice of intent to fine to the employee or employer. The government will not fine an employer for hiring an individual with fraudulent documents, if the employer reviewed the documents and believed that they were genuine.
• The employee had temporary work authorization. If the original I-9 indicated the employee was temporarily authorized to work, the employer is required to re-verify eligibility for continued employment on or before the date the temporary work authorization expires. This may only be done in connection with expiring work authorization however.

For more information see:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services at:
http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/EEV.htm

DHS/USCIS Final Rule on Special Immigrant Visas for Fourth Preference Employment-Based Broadcasters

[Federal Register: April 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 74)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19805-19806]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18ap06-2]

—————————————

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

8 CFR Part 204

[CIS No. 2106-00]

RIN 1615-AA47

Special Immigrant Visas for Fourth Preference Employment-Based
Broadcasters

AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.

ACTION: Final rule.

—————————————

SUMMARY: This rule adopts, without change, the interim rule published
by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) in the
Federal Register on October 11, 2001, that established procedures under
which the International Broadcasting Bureau of the United States
Broadcasting Board of Governors, or a grantee organization, could file
immigrant visa petitions for foreign language alien broadcasters. The
rule explained the requirements that alien broadcasters must meet in
order to be the beneficiary of an immigrant visa petition. The public
did not submit any comments to the interim rule.

DATES: This final rule is effective May 18, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alanna Ow, Adjudications Officer,
Business and Trade Services Branch, Office of Program and Regulations
Development, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor (ULLICO),
Washington, DC 20529, telephone (202) 616-7417.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Section 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides
for the allocation of preference visas for both family and employment-
based immigrants.\1\ The fourth preference, employment-based category
(EB-4), allows for the immigration of a variety of aliens who possess
various specialized job skills or abilities. Id. at 203(b)(4). Section
101(a)(27) of the INA also offers definitions of the various jobs or
professions that aliens must hold or possess in order to qualify for
the EB-4 category.

—————————————

\1\ The first preference, priority workers, allows for the
immigration of workers with extraordinary abilities in the sciences,
arts, education, business, or athletics; outstanding professors and
researchers; and certain multinational executives. Id. at 203(b)(1).
The second preference allows for the immigration of professionals
holding advanced degrees. Id. at 203(b)(2). The third preference
allows for the immigration of skilled workers in short supply and
professionals holding baccalaureate degrees. Id. at 203(b)(3).

—————————————

Legislative and Regulatory History

On November 22, 2000, President Clinton signed the Special
Immigrant Status For Certain United States International Broadcasting
Employees Act (IBE Act), Public Law 106-536. Section 1 of the IBE Act
amended section 101(a)(27) of the INA by adding a new subparagraph. The
amendment established a special fourth preference employment-based
immigrant category for immigrants seeking to enter the United States to
work as broadcasters in

[[Page 19806]]

the United States for the International Broadcasting Bureau of the
United States Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) or a BBG grantee.
(Currently, BBG grantees are Radio Free Asia, Inc. and Radio Free
Europe/Radio Liberty, Inc.)

On October 11, 2001, at 66 FR 51819, the former Service published
an interim rule in the Federal Register that added 8 CFR 204.13 and
established an administrative procedure for the BBG and its grantees to
use in order to petition for the services of an alien broadcaster. The
interim rule also codified the provisions of the IBE Act and put into
place procedures for the BBG, its grantees, and former Service
officers, now U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
officers, to follow.

Why Does the BBG Need Alien Broadcasters?

The BBG and its grantees are charged by Congress to broadcast
internationally on behalf of the United States Government. This
requires that the BBG attract and retain a large number of foreign
language broadcasters. These broadcasters must have the unique
combination of native fluency in the broadcast language combined with
an in-depth knowledge of the people, history, and culture of the
broadcast area. Historically, the BBG has experienced difficulty in
finding and employing members of the domestic workforce possessing this
unusual combination of skills to meet the United States Government’s
international broadcasting needs.

By creating a new special EB-4 subcategory, the IBE Act allows the
BBG and its grantees to directly petition for alien broadcasters. Being
able to offer immigrant status to an alien broadcaster and his or her
spouse and children may assist the BBG in fulfilling its obligation as
the international broadcasting conduit for the United States
Government. Under section 203(b)(4) of the INA, only 100 such visas may
be made available in any fiscal year to alien broadcasters coming to
work for BBG or a BBG grantee. This numerical limitation does not
apply, however, to the spouses and children of such immigrants.

Did the Former Service Receive Any Comments on the Interim Rule?

The former Service did not receive any comments during the 60-day
comment period in response to the interim rule. Accordingly, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is now adopting the interim rule
as a final rule without change.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

DHS has reviewed this regulation in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), and, by approving it, certifies that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The October 11, 2001, interim rule provided a
special process that benefits individuals who will be coming to the
United States to work as broadcasters. It did not affect small entities
as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(6). Since this final rule does
not make any changes to the interim rule, this final rule likewise will
not affect small entities.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-
based companies in domestic and export markets.

Executive Order 12866

This rule is not considered by DHS to be a “significant regulatory
action” under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning
and Review. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
waived its review process under section 6(a)(3)(A).

Executive Order 13132

This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of
Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.

Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform

This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.

Paperwork Reduction Act

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, all
Departments are required to submit to OMB, for review and approval, any
reporting requirements inherent in a rule. This rule does not impose
any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.

List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 204

Administrative practice and procedures, Aliens, Employment,
Immigration, Petitions.

Accordingly, the interim rule amending 8 CFR part 204, which was
published in the Federal Register at 66 FR 51819, on October 11, 2001,
is adopted as a final rule without change.

Dated: April 11, 2006.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-3655 Filed 4-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-10-P

USCIS Case Status On-Line Not Working Properly

April 21, 2006
VIA American Immmigration Lawyers Association

USCIS has confirmed that the Case Status On-Line system is experiencing
difficulties and work is underway to correct the problem.

Current Cap Count for Non-Immigrant Worker Visas For Fiscal Year 2007 as of 04/03/2006

04/10/2006

H-1B Cap Count as of 04/03/2006:

 

Cap

Beneficiaries Approved

Beneficiaries Pending

Beneficiary Target 1

Total

Date of Last Count

H-1B

58,200 2

76

1,555

61,000

1,631

4/3/2006

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption

20,000

9

331

21,000

340

4/3/2006

H-1B (FY 06)

58,200

——

——

——

Cap Reached

8/10/2005

H-1B Advance Degree Exemption (FY 06)

20,000

——

——

——

Cap Reached

1/17/2006

View complete report here