Updated List of SEVIS Schools – 1/14/2009
<A href="/files/4941-4844/approvedschools1.pdf”>On 1/14/09 ICE updated its list of Student and Exchange Visitor Program approved schools.
The New Naturalization Test: Questions and Answers from the CIS Ombudsman’s E-mails
1. The new test indicates that people who live in the US for
20 or more years and who are 70 or older are eligible to take the
naturalization test with 20 questions in lieu of 100. Our question is:
In what language? English or native language.
Response from USCIS: The new naturalization test did not change the
regulations that allow exemptions for testing based on age and time as
a permanent resident.
An applicant qualifies to take a modified civics test if on the date
of filing the application, the applicant was 65 years old and has been
a lawful permanent resident for at least 20 years. If this exception
applies, the applicant will be administered a simpler version of the
civics examination in the applicant’s language of choice. This modified
civics test is a sample of 20 civics questions from the list of 100.
The sample civics questions have been identified for applicants qualifying under this exception and will soon be announced.
2. After October 1, 2008 when the new test becomes
effective, will the current rule “English Exemption for people 55 or
older and resident in the US for 15 or more years” be still applicable?
Response from USCIS: Currently the people who meet these
requirements are eligible to take the naturalization test in their
native language. The new naturalization test did not change the
regulations that allow exemptions for testing based on age and time as
a permanent resident.
The English language requirement may be waived for an applicant who
on the date of filing the application, was over 50 years old and has
been lawful permanent resident for at least 20 years, or was over 55
years old and has been a lawful permanent resident for at least 15
years. If either exception applies, the applicant may take the civics
examination in the applicant’s language of choice.
Further, an applicant qualifies to take a modified civics test if on
the date of filing the application, the applicant was 65 years old and
has been a lawful permanent resident for at least 20 years. If this
exception applies, the applicant will be administered a simpler version
of the civics examination in the applicant’s language of choice. This
modified civics test is a sample of 20 civics questions from the list
of 100. The sample civics questions have been identified for applicants
qualifying under this exception and will soon be announced.
If applicants qualify for a waiver of the English proficiency
requirement, they must bring an interpreter to their naturalization
interview.
3. The new test has a list of reading vocabulary and
a list of writing vocabulary. Please explain how the reading and
writing test will be administered? Will the applicants be required to
make sentences using the vocabulary on the list?
Response from USCIS: The format for the reading portion of the
redesigned English test is similar to the current test. Applicants
will be provided with up to three chances to correctly read a sentence
in English. USCIS has released a vocabulary list containing all of the
words found in the redesigned test items. The content items for the
reading portion focus on civics and history topics.
The format for the writing portion of the redesigned writing test is
also similar to the current test. Applicants will be provided with up
to three chances to correctly write a sentence dictated by the
adjudications officer in English. USCIS has released a vocabulary list
containing all the words found in the redesigned writing test. The
content items for the writing portion also focus on civics and history
topics.
USCIS has posted the reading and writing vocabulary for the new test on http://www.uscis.gov/newtest.
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test
In the interest of creating a more
standardized, fair, and meaningful naturalization process, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently completed a
multi-year redesign of the naturalization test. The revised test, with
an emphasis on the fundamental concepts of American democracy and the
rights and responsibilities of citizenship, will help encourage
citizenship applicants to learn and identify with the basic values we
all share as Americans.
Redesign Process
The
major aim of the redesign process is to ensure that naturalization
applicants have uniform, consistent testing experiences nationwide, and
that the civics test can effectively assess whether applicants have a
meaningful understanding of U.S. government and history. Following a
basic U.S. history and civics curriculum, the redesigned test will
serve as an important instrument to encourage civic learning and
patriotism among prospective citizens.
To accomplish these
goals, USCIS initially piloted a new test–with an overhauled English
reading and writing section, as well as new history and government
questions–in ten sites across the country. The feedback from this pilot
was then used to finalize testing procedures, English reading and
writing prompts, and a list of 100 new history and government
questions. To ensure the pilot accounted for a representative sample of
candidates with a variety of education levels, the test was also
piloted at adult education sites nationwide.
The resulting
redesigned test was publicly introduced on September 27, 2007.
Naturalization applicants will begin taking the revised test on October 1, 2008.
Which Test Do I Take?
USCIS
will begin administering the redesigned (new) naturalization test on
October 1, 2008. Use the chart below to determine if you will take
the old or redesigned (new) test.
|
Date Form N-400 Filed* |
Date of Initial Exam |
Test to be Taken |
If Applicant Fails Initial Exam, Re-test to be Taken |
|
Before October 1, 2008 |
Before October 1, 2008 |
Old Test |
Old Test |
|
Before October 1, 2008 |
On or After October 1, 2008 up until October 1, 2009 |
Applicant’s Choice of |
The same version of the test as the one taken during the initial examination |
|
On or After October 1, 2008 |
On or After October 1, 2008 |
Redesigned (New) Test |
Redesigned (New) Test |
|
At Any Time (i.e. Before, On or After October 1, 2008) |
On or After October 1, 2009 |
Redesigned (New) Test |
Redesigned (New) Test |
*The Application for Naturalization, Form N-400,
is properly filed with USCIS on the date it is received by the
appropriate USCIS Office with signature, correct fee, and the form is
completed according to instructions.
This page can be found at http://www.uscis.gov/newtest
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Vocabulary List for the English Reading Test (165KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Vocabulary List for the English Writing Test (167KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Civics (History and Government) Questions (336KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Civics (History and Government) Questions (Spanish Version) (332KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Civics (History and Government) Questions (Chinese Version) (363KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Civics (History and Government) Questions (Tagalog Version) (289KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Civics (History and Government) Questions (Vietnamese Version) (278KB PDF)
-
Civics Flash Cards for the New Naturalization Test (7523KB PDF)
A useful study tool for teachers and students. -
Civics Flash Cards for the New Naturalization Test (reversed colors) (7084KB PDF)
-
Learn About the United States: Quick Civics Lessons for the New Naturalization Test (1532KB PDF)
-
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test Informational Brochure (493KB PDF)
-
Scoring Guidelines for the English Portion of the Naturalization Test (40KB PDF)
-
Naturalization Test Redesign Project: Civics Item Selection Analysis (5664KB PDF)
-
New Naturalization Test Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) (62KB PDF)
-
New Naturalization Test Fact Sheet (56KB PDF)
DHS Publishes Final Rule Expanding US-VISIT to Include LPRs
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 77473-77491]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19de08-1]
—————————————
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
—————————————
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week.
—————————————
[[Page 77473]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 215 and 235
[DHS-2005-0037]
RIN 1601-AA35; RIN 1600-AA00
United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program (“US-VISIT”); Enrollment of Additional Aliens in US-VISIT; Authority To Collect Biometric Data From Additional Travelers and Expansion to the 50 Most Highly Trafficked Land Border Ports of Entry
AGENCY: National Protection and Programs Directorate, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
—————————————
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) established the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program (US-VISIT) in 2003 to verify the identities and travel documents of aliens. Aliens subject to US-VISIT may be required to provide fingerscans, photographs, or other biometric identifiers upon arrival at the United States. Currently, aliens arriving at a United States port of entry with a nonimmigrant visa, or those traveling without a visa as part of the Visa Waiver Program, are subject to US-VISIT requirements with certain limited exceptions. This final rule expands the population of aliens who will be subject to US-VISIT requirements to nearly all aliens, including lawful permanent residents. Exceptions include Canadian citizens seeking short-term admission for business or pleasure under B visas and individuals traveling on A and G visas, among others.
USCIS Publishes Notice on Revision to Direct Mail Program for N-400s
[Federal Register: December 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 78818-78820]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23de08-104]
=======================================
———————————————-
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
[CIS No. 2457-08; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2008-0036] RIN 1615-ZA74
Revision to Direct Mail Program for Submitting Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, Implementation of Program
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
—————————————–
SUMMARY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is revising its Direct Mail Program so that certain filings of Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, will now be filed at a designated lockbox facility instead of a USCIS Service Center. Furthermore, if you are the spouse of a current member of the Armed Forces, this notice instructs you to now file your Form N-400 at the Nebraska Service Center (NSC), whether you are filing from within the U.S. or abroad. This notice does not change the filing location for Forms N-400 filed by members or certain veterans of the Armed Forces who are eligible to apply for naturalization under sections 328 or 329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act). All naturalization applicants filing under the military provisions, sections 328 or 329 of the Act, should file their application at the NSC regardless of geographic location.
DATES: This notice becomes effective January 22, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Stanley, Chief, Lockbox Operations Division, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20529-2130, Telephone (202) 233-2385.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
What Is the Direct Mail Program?
The Direct Mail Program allows applicants for certain immigration benefits to send their application or petition directly to a USCIS service center or lockbox facility instead of submitting it to their local USCIS office.
The Direct Mail Program allows USCIS to:
Standardize and more efficiently process applications by eliminating duplicative work;
[[Page 78819]]
Increase staff productivity; and
Introduce better information management tools.
The purpose and strategy of the Direct Mail Program has been discussed in detail in previous rulemaking and notices. (See 59 FR 33903, 59 FR 33985, 60 FR 22408, 61 FR 2266, 61 FR 56060, 62 FR 16607, 63 FR 891, 63 FR 892, 63 FR 13434, 63 FR 13878, 63 FR 16828, 63 FR 50584, 63 FR 8688, 63 FR 8689, 64 FR 67323, 69 FR 3380, 69 FR 4210, 70 FR 30768, 72 FR 3402, 73 FR 50336 and 73 FR 53034.)
Explanation of Changes
Will this notice change my eligibility for naturalization?
No. This notice will not affect your eligibility for naturalization. This notice only affects the filing instructions where certain Form N-400s must be mailed. Some Form N-400s that were previously filed at USCIS Service Centers must now be sent to a designated lockbox facility.
Please note that applicants filing under the military provision, sections 328 or 329 of the Act, as well as spouses of current members of the Armed Forces, have separate filing instructions. Filing changes will be discussed in detail in the following charts.
Where should I send my Form N-400 and all supporting documentation?
Please refer to the following charts for the filing location to send your completed Form N-400 and supporting documentation.
Armed Forces Applicants and Spouses of Current Members of the Armed Forces
—————————————————
see pdf for table
—————————————————
—————————————————
Non-Armed Forces Applicants
—————————————————
see pdf for table
————————————————–
[[Page 78820]]
—————————————————
What happens if I file a Form N-400 covered by this notice at the wrong location?
During the first 30 days after this notice takes affect, USCIS will forward incorrectly addressed Form N-400s to the proper address, rather than reject it. USCIS will forward any improperly addressed Form N-400s covered by this notice as follows:
Any Form N-400 from non-Armed Forces applicants will be forwarded to either the Dallas or Phoenix lockbox facilities.
Any Form N-400 from Armed Forces applicants and the spouses of current members of the Armed Forces will be forwarded to the Nebraska Service Center.
Any applications forwarded within this time period will be considered properly filed when received at either the Dallas or Phoenix lockbox facilities, or the Nebraska Service Center. After this 30-day transition period, any Form N-400 covered by this notice, which is received at a location other than the appropriate location as defined in the updated Form N-400 filing instructions provided in this notice, will be returned with an explanation directing the applicant to mail it to the appropriate processing facility.
Is USCIS amending the Form N-400 Instructions?
Yes. USCIS is currently amending the instructions to the Form N- 400. The revisions will include the new filing addresses, the requirement for passport style photos and the revision will provide clarification of the grounds for rejection of an application. When available, the new form will be posted on the USCIS Web site (http:// <a href="http://www.uscis.gov).
“>www.uscis.gov).Where may I find information related to eligibility requirements for naturalization?
You may find general eligibility requirements for naturalization at our Web site (http://www.uscis.gov). You may also download “A Guide to Naturalization (Form M-476),” which provides information on the benefits and responsibilities of citizenship, an overview of the naturalization process, and eligibility requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We will be amending the instructions to the Form N-400 to reflect the new filing instructions. Accordingly, we will provide the Office of Management and Budget with a copy of the amended form through the automated Regulatory Office Combined Information System (ROCIS). Changing the filing instructions will not have any effect on the reporting burden hours. The OMB control number for this collection is 1615-0052.
Dated: December 17, 2008.
Michael Aytes,
Acting Deputy Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
[FR Doc. E8-30531 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P
USCIS burdens computer consulting companies
Via IndiaPost.com
“Recently, the USCIS started issuing a slew of Requests for Evidence (“RFEs”), specifically targeting computer consulting companies, even companies that are well established. RFEs are issued after an employer files an H-1B petition on behalf of a foreign employee.
These lengthy and detailed RFEs, some 4 to 5 pages long, are issued where a new employer files either a new H-1B petition or an H-1B extension or where the same employer requests continuation of previously approved employment without change in employer.
The RFEs have become a source of confusion and frustration for Petitioners and immigration practitioners alike who are unable to comprehend why the submitted documentation is not sufficiently persuasive on a particular issue. “
Continue Reading
USCIS H-1B Benefit Fraud & Compliance Assessment
BACKGROUND: The Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS), a Division of the National Security and Records Verification (NSRV) Directorate, drafted this report, in collaboration with the other USCIS Directorates and the USCIS Office of Chief Counsel. All USCIS components reviewed the cases involving fraud or technical violations and the proposed enhancements to the H-1B program and concurred on the report.
<A href="/files/4941-4844/uscis_h1b_audit_report.pdf”>View Report
USCIS Publishes Final Rule on Period of Admission and Extension of Stay for TNs (Updated 10/16/08)
VIA USCIS
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61332-61336]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16oc08-2]
—————————————–
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
8 CFR Parts 214 and 248
[CIS No. 2429-07; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2007-0056]
RIN 1615-AB64
Period of Admission and Extension of Stay for Canadian and Mexican Citizens Engaged in Professional Business Activities–TN Nonimmigrants
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
—————————————–
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its regulations to allow an increased period of admission and extension of stay for Canadian and Mexican citizens who seek temporary entry to the United States as professionals pursuant to the TN classification, as established by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA or Agreement). This final rule increases the maximum allowable period of admission for TN nonimmigrants from one year to three years, and allows otherwise eligible TN nonimmigrants to be granted an extension of stay in increments of up to three years instead of the current maximum of one year. In addition, this rule grants the same periods of admission or extension to TD nonimmigrants, the spouses and unmarried minor children of TN nonimmigrants to run concurrent. The rule also removes the mention of specific petition filing locations from the TN regulations and replaces the outdated term “TC” (the previous term given to Canadian workers under the 1989 Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement) with “TN.” This rule will reduce the administrative burden of the TN classification on USCIS, and will ease the entry of eligible professionals to the United States.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 16, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paola Rodriguez Hale, Adjudications Officer, Business and Trade Services, Office of Service Center Operations, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20529, telephone (202) 272-8410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. NAFTA and the TN Classification
NAFTA and the NAFTA Implementation Act, Public Law 103-182, redesignated section 214(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to create the “trade NAFTA” (TN) nonimmigrant classification and provide for the temporary entry of qualified business persons from each of the countries that signed the Agreement. The TN nonimmigrant classification permits qualified Canadian and Mexican citizens to seek temporary entry as business persons to engage in professional business activities at a professional level in the United States. 8 CFR 214.6(a). DHS regulations currently require that TN nonimmigrants may be admitted to the United States for a period not to exceed one year. 8 CFR 214.6(e). The regulations further provide that TN professionals may apply for extensions of stay for a maximum period of one year. 8 CFR 214.6(h)(1).
B. Proposed Rule
On May 9, 2008, DHS published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register at 73 FR 26340 proposing a change in the period of admission and extension of stay granted to TN nonimmigrants from Canada and Mexico engaged in professional business activities. The notice also proposed granting the same period of admission or extension of stay to TN dependents (TD nonimmigrants), removing outdated references to specific filing locations and prior requirements, and replacing the outdated term TC with the current TN term. Written comments to the proposed rule were due on or before June 9, 2008.
In this final rule, DHS is adopting the proposed rule with no changes. The proposed rule was, and this final rule is, intended to improve the administration of the TN program and make it more flexible and attractive to Canadian and Mexican professionals and to employers in the United States. Currently, DHS regulations require TN nonimmigrants, to either seek readmission in TN status or apply for extensions of stay annually if they wish to remain in the United States beyond the period of their initial admission. 8 CFR 214.6(h). This requirement involves the annual submission of documentation and payment of filing fees. By removing these types of administrative requirements on TN employees and their U.S. employers, DHS will further the intent of NAFTA to facilitate the entry of eligible professionals into the United States.
II. Comments Received in Response to the Proposed Rule
DHS received 80 comments in response to the proposed rule. The majority of commenters (76) supported this rulemaking. Many of these 76 commenters suggested additional changes or enhancements to the TN classification regulations which were not part of the proposed rule. Two commenters opposed the proposed rule. One of these two commenters asked questions about lawful permanent residence and educational opportunities for aliens in the TN classification, but did not express an opinion on the proposed rule. The second of these two commenters simply complained about a perceived slight to U.S. workers contained in another public comment. Many of the received comments raised issues that are beyond the scope of this rulemaking but will be mentioned briefly as part of this disposition of the comments.
A. Increase to Three Years for Admissions and Extensions of Stay
Comments on period of admission: The overwhelming majority of the commenters supported increasing the period of admission and extensions of stay granted to TN nonimmigrants from one to three years. Only two commenters opposed this proposal because they thought that jobs should be offered to U.S. workers rather than to foreign nationals. One commenter stated that the U.S. economy is suffering and jobs should thus be reserved for U.S. workers. The other commenter stated that the United States is presently flooded with immigrants and the TN program should be shut down while the country sorts out the problems with illegal immigrants present in the United States, and also made additional comments about aliens, politicians and the U.S. government in general.
[[Page 61333]]
Response to comments on period of admission: DHS has not adopted these comments in opposition. This rule does not make it easier to hire TN nonimmigrants by altering eligibility requirements, changing existing filing fee requirements, or expanding the principle of “dual intent.” Rather, this rule simply increases the amount of time granted to a TN nonimmigrant once all eligibility requirements have been established. This rule has nothing to do with permanent immigration or illegal immigrants presently within the United States.
B. Other Comments
Comments on dual intent: Thirteen commenters requested that TN nonimmigrants be granted “dual intent” and thereby be allowed to pursue permanent resident status while present in the United States in nonimmigrant status similar to the H-1B and L-1 nonimmigrant programs.
Response to comments on dual intent: The dual intent doctrine holds that even though a nonimmigrant visa applicant has previously expressed a desire to enter the United States as an immigrant, and may still have such a desire, that does not of itself preclude USCIS from issuing a nonimmigrant visa to him or her nor preclude his or her being a bona fide nonimmigrant. Matter of H-R-, 7 I&N Dec. 651, 654 (INS Reg. Comm’r 1958). See also INA section 214(h) (limiting dual intent to certain H, L, and V nonimmigrants); 8 U.S.C. 1184(h). Dual intent cannot be provided solely through regulation; it must be authorized by statute and it is not authorized in the TN nonimmigrant context. Furthermore, temporary entry, as defined in Chapter 16 of the NAFTA, Article 1608, is “entry into the territory of a Party by a business person of another Party without the intent to establish permanent residence.” Congressional approval of this Article in the NAFTA treaty indicates that Congress did not intend TNs to have dual intent. Therefore, the commenters’ suggestion will not be adopted because it is clearly inconsistent with Article 1608 and Congressional intent.
Comment on inability of Mexican TN nonimmigrants to apply for admission at the border: One commenter requested that Mexican TN nonimmigrants be able to apply for admission at designated ports-of- entry similar to Canadian TN nonimmigrants. Currently, Mexican workers are required to obtain visas from the Department of State (DOS) before entering the United States.
Response to comment on inability of Mexican TN nonimmigrants to apply for admission at the border: DHS appreciates the suggestion made by this commenter but the suggestion is outside the scope of this regulation. This rule deals with increasing the period of time granted to a TN nonimmigrant upon admission or pursuant to a timely filed request for extension of stay from a maximum of one year to a maximum of three years. Any additional regulatory changes, including a change to the place of admission, exceed the scope of this rule The commenter’s suggestion, therefore, is not adopted.
Comment on advance approval of Canadian admission requests: One commenter requested that Canadian TN nonimmigrants be permitted to file petitions with USCIS Service Centers for admission as an alternative to requesting admission at U.S. ports-of-entry, so that applications for TN status can be approved in advance of entry dates rather than requiring intended employees to actually apply for status before knowing whether their applications will be approved.
Response to comment on advance approval of Canadian admission requests: DHS appreciates the suggestion made by this commenter. However, such reform exceeds the scope of the changes in the proposed rule and is not adopted in this final rule. The suggestion may be considered for future rulemaking involving TN nonimmigrants.
Comments on erroneous periods of admission: Several commenters suggested that some TN nonimmigrants have erroneously been admitted for three years instead of a validity period of one year. Thus, one commenter requested that this rule should have a retroactive effective date to correct this problem.
Response to comments on erroneous periods of admission: DHS understands these commenters’ concerns. However, TN nonimmigrants who were admitted for a period of more than the one-year were granted that period of admission in violation of 8 CFR 214.6(e) as it existed prior to this rulemaking. Petitions must be processed in accordance with the regulations in effect when submitted, and this rule cannot deem those who were erroneously granted more than one year in the past to meet the requirements in this rule by making its provisions retroactive. Therefore, the commenter’s suggestion was not adopted. Each TN nonimmigrant erroneously admitted for periods of three years prior to the effective date of this rulemaking is encouraged to correct his or her Form I-94 at a port-of-entry or deferred inspection station to ensure compliance with existing regulations and to ensure that he or she does not remain in the U.S. for a period longer than is authorized by law.
Miscellaneous comments: Several commenters requested a more comprehensive reform of the TN regulations to include the following: more extensive definitions for the positions of Management Consultant and Scientific Technician/Technologist; increased vigilance against TN fraud; the establishment of clear guidelines in determining a “closely related” degree; an increase in the fee for port-of-entry processing of each TN application; a 30-day period during which the TN worker could enter the U.S. before the employment start date and/or remain outside the country without having the TN status invalidated; and work authorization for the spouses of TN nonimmigrants.
Response to miscellaneous comments: DHS appreciates the suggestions made by the commenters. However, such comprehensive reform of the TN program exceeds the scope of the proposed rule, which was simply focused on allowing TN nonimmigrants and their employers a more stable and predictable period of employment. Therefore, the commenters’ suggestions are not adopted in this rule.
III. Regulatory Requirements
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
1. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
DHS reviewed this rule in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act and determined that this rule will reduce compliance costs on the regulated industries. This rule will reduce information collection costs for the public, and will reduce USCIS legal costs and the amount of fees collected, because TN and TD status holders will not have to renew their statuses each year. There are no provisions in this rule that add compliance costs. Therefore, DHS certifies that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
2. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, DHS performed a final regulatory flexibility analysis regarding the economic effects of this rule on small entities. DHS has not identified any duplication, overlap, or conflict of this rule with other Federal rules. Since DHS does not foresee the rule having an economic impact on small entities, this rule does not put forth significant alternatives to minimize impacts. The rule benefits the United States by reducing burden in the TN nonimmigrant status program. No
[[Page 61334]]
cost increases due to the revised requirements are expected. USCIS invited the public to comment on the extent of any potential economic impact of this rule on small entities, the scope of these costs, a more accurate means for defining these costs, and the estimated cost to petitioning firms to comply with the new requirements. In response to those requests, USCIS received no comments. Therefore, DHS certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, no further regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of U.S.-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
D. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
This rule has been designated as a “significant regulatory action” by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. Accordingly, an analysis of the economic impact of this rule has been prepared and submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
DHS has determined that this rule decreases the costs imposed by the TN nonimmigrant program on the government as well as the public. The changes made by this rule will result in more satisfaction with the TN program among TN nonimmigrants and their U.S. employers by increasing program flexibility and reducing time and travel restrictions. The expected effect is an increase in the number of TN nonimmigrants in the United States. A small economic benefit may result from the increased availability of scarce workers for U.S. employers in particular fields and industries. This rule will result in cumulative TN application fees decreasing by approximately $2.4 million per year. In addition, the total paperwork burden costs on the public will decrease by about 12,225 hours and $340,000 as a result of fewer required filings. Eventually, DOS and U.S. Customs and Border Protection annual fee collections from TN nonimmigrants will also decrease as a result of this rule. A copy of DHS’ complete analysis is available in the rulemaking docket for this rule at www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. USCIS-2007-0056, or by calling the information contact listed above.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This rule will have no substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (PRA), all Departments are required to submit to OMB, for review and approval, any reporting or recordkeeping requirements inherent in a rule. This rulemaking does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act. However, by requiring TN and TD status renewals every three years instead of every year, this rule will reduce the volume of Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, filings, Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service, filings, and Form I-539, Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, filings per year, and so will reduce the aggregate paperwork burden on the public accordingly. Accordingly, USCIS has submitted the OMB Correction Worksheets (OMB-83C) to the Office of Management and Budget, reducing the burden hours and costs associated with these forms.
List of Subjects
8 CFR Part 214
Administrative practice and procedure, Aliens, Employment, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
8 CFR Part 248
Aliens, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, chapter I of title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 214–NONIMMIGRANT CLASSES
1. The authority citation for part 214 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1102, 1103, 1182, 1184, 1186a, 1187, 1221, 1258, 1281, 1282, 1301-1305 and 1372; sec. 643, Public Law 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-708; section 141 of the Compacts of Free Association with the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and with the Government of Palau, 48 U.S.C. 1901 note, and 1931 note, respectively; 8 CFR part 2.
Sec. 214.1 [Amended]
2. Section 214.1 is amended by:
a. Removing the designation “Cdn FTA, Professional” and “TC” from the list in paragraph (a)(2);
b. Removing the term “TC” and adding “TN” in its place in the first sentence in paragraph (c)(1).
3. Section 214.6 is amended by:
a. Revising the section heading and revising paragraphs (e), (g), and (h);
b. Redesignating paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2) and (j)(3) as paragraphs (j)(2), (j)(3), and (j)(4), respectively;
c. Adding a new paragraph (j)(1);
d. Revising newly redesignated paragraphs (j)(2), (j)(3), and (j)(4); and by
e. Revising paragraph (k);
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 214.6 Citizens of Canada or Mexico seeking temporary entry under NAFTA to engage in business activities at a professional level.
* * * * *
(e) Procedures for admission. A citizen of Canada or Mexico who qualifies for admission under this section shall be provided confirming documentation and shall be admitted under the classification symbol TN for a period not to exceed three years. The conforming document provided shall bear the legend “multiple entry.” The fee prescribed under 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1) shall be remitted by Canadian Citizens upon admission to the United States pursuant to the terms and conditions of the NAFTA. Upon remittance of the prescribed fee, the TN applicant for admission shall be provided a DHS-issued receipt on the appropriate form.
* * * * *
(g) Readmission. (1) With a Form I-94. An alien may be readmitted to the
[[Page 61335]]
United States in TN classification for the remainder of the authorized period of TN admission on Form I-94, without presentation of the letter or supporting documentation described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, and without the prescribed fee set forth in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1), provided that the original intended professional activities and employer(s) have not changed, and the Form I-94 has not expired.
(2) Without a valid I-94. If the alien seeking readmission to the United States in TN classification is no longer in possession of a valid, unexpired Form I-94, and the period of initial admission in TN classification has not lapsed, then a new Form I-94 may be issued for the period of validity that remains on the TN nonimmigrant’s original Form I-94 with the legend “multiple entry” and the alien can then be readmitted in TN status if the alien presents alternate evidence as follows:
(i) For Canadian citizens, alternate evidence may include, but is not limited to, a fee receipt for admission as a TN or a previously issued admission stamp as TN in a passport, and a confirming letter from the United States employer(s).
(ii) For Mexican citizens seeking readmission as TN nonimmigrants, alternate evidence shall consist of presentation of a valid unexpired TN visa and evidence of a previous admission.
(h) Extension of stay. (1) Filing. A United States employer of a citizen of Canada or Mexico who is currently maintaining valid TN nonimmigrant status, or a United States entity (in the case of a citizen of Canada or Mexico who is currently maintaining valid TN nonimmigrant status and is employed by a foreign employer), may request an extension of stay, subject to the following conditions:
(i) An extension of stay must be requested by filing the appropriate form with the fee provided at 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1), in accordance with the form instructions with USCIS.
(ii) The beneficiary must be physically present in the United States at the time of the filing of the appropriate form requesting an extension of stay as a TN nonimmigrant. If the alien is required to leave the United States for any reason while the petition is pending, the petitioner may request that USCIS notify the consular office where the beneficiary is required to apply for a visa or, if visa exempt, a DHS-designated port-of-entry where the beneficiary will apply for admission to the United States, of the approval.
(iii) An extension of stay in TN status may be approved by USCIS for a maximum period of three years.
(iv) There is no specific limit on the total period of time an alien may be in TN status provided the alien continues to be engaged in TN business activities for a U.S. employer or entity at a professional level, and otherwise continues to properly maintain TN nonimmigrant status.
(2) Readmission at the border. Nothing in paragraph (h)(1) of this section shall preclude a citizen of Canada or Mexico who has previously been admitted to the United States in TN status, and who has not violated such status while in the United States, from applying at a DHS-designated port-of-entry, prior to the expiration date of the previous period of admission, for a new three-year period of admission. The application for a new period of admission must be supported by a new letter from the United States employer or the foreign employer, in the case of a citizen of Canada who is providing prearranged services to a United States entity, which meets the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, together with the appropriate filing fee as noted in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1). Citizens of Mexico must present a valid passport and a valid, unexpired TN nonimmigrant visa when applying for readmission, as outlined in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
* * * * *
(j) * * * (1) The spouse or unmarried minor children of a citizen of Canada or Mexico admitted in TN nonimmigrant status, if otherwise admissible, may be admitted initially, readmitted, or granted a change of nonimmigrant status or an extension of his or her period of stay for the same period of time granted to the TN nonimmigrant. Such spouse or unmarried minor children shall, upon approval of an application for admission, readmission, change of status or extension of stay be classified as TD nonimmigrants. A request for a change of status to TD or an extension of stay of a TD nonimmigrant may be made on the appropriate form together with appropriate filing fees and evidence of the principal alien’s current TN status.
(2) The spouse or unmarried minor children of a citizen of Canada or Mexico admitted in TN nonimmigrant status shall be required to present a valid, unexpired TD nonimmigrant visa unless otherwise exempt under 8 CFR 212.1.
(3) The spouse and unmarried minor children of a citizen of Canada or Mexico admitted in TN nonimmigrant status shall be issued confirming documentation bearing the legend “multiple entry.” There shall be no fee required for admission of the spouse and unmarried minor children.
(4) The spouse and unmarried minor children of a citizen of Canada or Mexico admitted in TN nonimmigrant status shall not accept employment in the United States unless otherwise authorized under the Act.
(k) Effect of a strike. (1) If the Secretary of Labor certifies or otherwise informs the Director of USCIS that a strike or other labor dispute involving a work stoppage of workers is in progress, and the temporary entry of a citizen of Mexico or Canada in TN nonimmigrant status may adversely affect the settlement of any labor dispute or the employment of any person who is involved in such dispute, the United States may refuse to issue an immigration document authorizing the entry or employment of such an alien.
(2) If the alien has already commenced employment in the United States and is participating in a strike or other labor dispute involving a work stoppage of workers, whether or not such strike or other labor dispute has been certified by the Department of Labor, or whether USCIS has been otherwise informed that such a strike or labor dispute is in progress, the alien shall not be deemed to be failing to maintain his or her status solely on account of past, present, or future participation in a strike or other labor dispute involving a work stoppage of workers, but is subject to the following terms and conditions:
(i) The alien shall remain subject to all applicable provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act and regulations promulgated in the same manner as all other TN nonimmigrants;
(ii) The status and authorized period of stay of such an alien is not modified or extended in any way by virtue of his or her participation in a strike or other labor dispute involving a work stoppage of workers; and
(iii) Although participation by a TN nonimmigrant alien in a strike or other labor dispute involving a work stoppage of workers will not constitute a ground for removal, any alien who violates his or her status or who remains in the United States after his or her authorized period of stay has expired will be subject to removal.
(3) If there is a strike or other labor dispute involving a work stoppage of workers in progress but such strike or other labor dispute is not certified under paragraph (k)(1) of this section, or USCIS has not otherwise been informed by the Secretary that such a strike or
[[Page 61336]]
labor dispute is in progress, Director of USCIS shall not deny a petition or deny entry to an applicant for TN status based upon such strike or other labor dispute.
PART 248–CHANGE OF NONIMMIGRANT CLASSIFICATION
4. The authority citation for part 248 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1184, 1258; 8 CFR part 2.
Sec. 248.3 [Amended]
5. Section 248.3 is amended by removing the term “TC” and adding the term “TN” in its place in the first sentence of paragraph (a).
Dated: September 15.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-24600 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P
Mistaken immigration raid?
Via kgbt4.com
Olga Savage said she went through a harrowing life-changing experience that might have been a total mistake.
The 68-year-old woman told Action 4 News that she heard a knock at her door Tuesday morning.
But before she had a chance to get up she said U.S. Immigration & Customers Enforcement (ICE) agents were inside her home.
“They came in with guns, grenades and holding their pistols,” Savage recalled.
When she asked them why they came into her home they allegedly responded, “Show us your papers.”
Savage complied by showing them documentation proving that she’s been a United States citizen for 40 years.
Feds say Wash. immigration guards weren’t checked
VIA AP
By GENE JOHNSON
SEATTLE (AP) — A privately run immigration lockup in Tacoma hired security guards without required preliminary background checks and then lied about it, according to authorities.
Continue reading
USCIS FAQ on Intercountry Adoptions
On 9/29/08 USCIS released FAQs on the intercountry adoption process since the implementation of the Hague Adoption Convention on 4/1/08.
<A href="/files/4941-4844/INTER_ADOPTIONS.pdf”>READ USCIS FAQ
