The FY2007 H-1B Season Is Upon Us – By Ashwin Sharma, Esq.
March 20, 2006
By Ashwin Sharma
The FY2007 H-1B visa quota opens Saturday April 1, 2006. There is no way to predict how long the quota will last with any degree of accuracy, therefore, it is adviseable to file petitions as soon as possible. Last year’s quota ran out Mid-August 2005 – it was expected by many to last until at least September or October 2005. Since the IT market is booming, it is expected that this year’s quota will run out faster than last year.
Employers can petition for H-1B nonimmigrant workers as early as six months prior to the employee’s anticipated start date. Therefore, if an employer wishes to have an employee start on October 1, 2006, the earliest date that the employer may file the petition with the USCIS is April 1, 2006.
This year I urge those of you who hold a US Masters degree or higher to file only for one of the 20,000 visas available for holders of advanced degrees. Ensure that your attorney has selected this exemption, and not the regular 65,000. This will obviously increase the number of visas for other applicants who only hold an undergraduate degree.
Some pointers to maximize your success of obtaining an H-1B this year:
-
File early.
-
Ensure that you have compiled all of the documentation that your employer or attorney has requested. Missing, incomplete, or unlegible supporting documentation will contribute to higher than normal processing delays due to the hectic filing period immediately following April 1, 2006. On a related note, confirm that your employer has also put together all necessary documentation. Following up with employers is crucial, especially those who are not familiar with the H-1B process.
-
Make legible copies of all documents. Always include photocopies of both sides of your SSN and I-94 (if applicable).
-
Again, if applicable, be sure to get your educational evaluations completed early.
-
Include documentation showing your valid status until at least October 1, 2006. If you are presently in H4 or other dependent status, obtain documentation showing that your spouse is in valid status until at least October 1, 2006.
-
Make certain that your job title matches your educational and/or work experience background. Consult the Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH), 2006-07 Edition to investigate the correlation between your job title, job duties and skill sets with your qualifications.
-
Make sure that your employer is offering the prevailing wage for your job and job location.
-
Discuss any past visa denials with your attorney.
Click here to view our firm’s H-1B page, or call us at 904-779-0111 if you have any questions about H-1B processing.
The H4 virus
Via IndianExpress.com
Three weeks to find a partner, 45 days to get rid of
her. When it comes to shotgun IT/NRI weddings, the numbers don’t add up
anymore, says
IT was a grand
ceremony. Sindhu Rajagopal was as excited about marrying a software
professional as her Thanjavur-based parents. The groom, Kamesh Kannan,
was the ideal package—a Silicon Valley-based consultant, and an IIT
graduate with a master’s degree from an American university. In five
years, Kamesh had started a consultancy firm that had nine branches
across the US and one in Chennai.
Having
gone to Virginia with her husband (an H1B visa-holder) on a dependant
H4 visa, Sindhu’s American dream soon began to sour. She did little
except cook, clean and later, look after her daughter. Her weekends
were equally tedious.
A fortnight ago,
after five years of marriage, 30-year-old Sindhu arrived in Chennai.
Kannan’s parents took possession of her visa and she now lives with her
parents. Back in Virginia, Kannan has initiated divorce proceedings.
Once Sindhu signs the legal notice, Kannan will have his divorce decree
in just 45 days.
This
is not an unusual story, or the stuff of low-budget, desi crossover
films. Speedy arranged marriages between NRI men and India-based women
are becoming more short-lived than ever before. In NRI lingo, they’re
known as ‘21-day weddings’—so called because everything takes place
within the groom’s three-week holiday. The first week, the prospective
boy and girl are introduced, they get to know each other the week
after, and the wedding takes place in the third. No space for any
intensive digging.
The
result: ‘‘There is an alarming rise in divorces among US-based IT
professionals,’’ says Menaka Rajendran, a lawyer with Smith White
Sharma & Halpern, a US-based immigration law firm. Rajendran, head
of the company’s Chennai office, claims more than 50 per cent of 21-day
marriages solemnized in Punjab, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and
Kerala over the last three years have broken down, some within a week.
More than 50 per cent of 21-day marriages solemnized in Punjab, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala over the last three years have broken down, some within a week |
Every
year, 65,000 (the prescribed quota for India) H1B visa holders leave
for the US. Of this, more than 40 per cent are software professionals.
Rajendran says her Chennai office gets at least one call a day from
US-based IT professionals’ wives. After opening its Chennai office in
1999, the law firm recently set up branches in Mumbai and Ahmedabad
after receiving numerous calls from these cities.
‘‘According
to US Immigration Laws, H4 dependant-visa holders are not eligible for
a social security number. Without that, these women cannot even open a
bank account, let alone get a driver’s licence or work permit,’’ says
Rajendran. According to US laws, divorce proceedings are quick and
after a divorce comes through, there’s little any law firm can do. Due
to a backlog of cases, judges in US courts (district counties, as they
are called) have no time to even check the veracity of the signatures
of the women on divorce petitions.
‘‘Few
women even know that their H4 visa could be converted to H1 in just 90
days. They can look for a job, start working and be more independent
and mobile,’’ says Rajendran. Most of the women who are back in India
believe they could never have worked in the US.
Lately,
Smith White Sharma & Halpern has taken to organising programmes
across the country to educate prospective brides. ‘‘We found that the
Russian and Japanese consulates have counsellors who guide first-time
travellers and find out their future status. But the US consulate here
and the Indian embassy in the US don’t provide counselling sessions to
visa applicants,’’ says K Aishwarya, a second-year MA student of the
MOP Vaishnov College for Women in Chennai, who recently organised a
two-day awareness programme in her college. ‘‘We have heard of so many
marriages of our friends and their friends breaking up. It is a typical
scenario now,’’ she says. The college also launched an intensive media
campaign to publicise the issue in local Tamil magazines and television
channels.
Thirty-two-year-old
Nisha Kapoor from Haryana was married to Manish Kapoor, an
Atlanta-based accountant, but she never managed to get to the US. Even
after the birth of their two children, her husband came up with various
reasons to dissuade her and her parents from visiting him. Since they
had not registered the marriage in India, legally they were unmarried.
After seven years, Nisha, a BSc graduate, found herself divorced.
Worse, she lost custody of her older daughter. Nisha had willingly
signed the papers for ‘dissolution of marriage’ under the ‘mutual
consent’ slot, without even reading them.
In
some cases, the woman takes the call. Twenty-three-year-old Vani Reddy,
the daughter of a wealthy businessman in Hyderabad, walked out on her
husband and flew down from the US a week after their marriage because
‘‘she was disgusted with his lifestyle’’. Her husband is waiting for
his easy, 45-day divorce to come through.
| A study conducted in six popular women’s colleges in Chennai found that while 92 per cent of the students would love a US-based husband, only three students knew about the dependant visa status and its consequences |
As
parents frantically hunt for IT/NRI grooms, young women continue to
fall into the H4 trap. ‘‘In a study we conducted in six popular women’s
colleges in Chennai, we found that while 92 per cent of the students
said they wanted arranged marriages and would love a US-settled
husband, only three students knew about the dependant visa status and
its consequences,’’ says Aishwarya.
In
the late ’90s, Georgia-based lawyer Paddy Sharma converted her house in
Atlanta into an asylum for divorced women of South Asian descent called
Raksha. Now she has a difficult time coping with calls pouring in from
the US and India. ‘‘Every single day, I get calls. I cannot believe
there are so many women all over the US who are ignorant about their
status as immigrants in this country,’’ she says.
Back
in India, Sindhu visits her lawyer, urging her to stop Kannan from
going ahead with the divorce proceedings. Nisha is almost on the verge
of getting custody of her son after fighting legal battles for almost
two years. Meanwhile, many prospective brides are waiting have their go
at a 21-day wedding.
(Some of the names have been changed on request)
Nanny’s time in U.S. running out
Via The Boston Herald
Time
is running out for a 32-year-old Hingham nanny who overstayed her
student visa and is set to be deported to her native Belgium Thursday.
Victorian
Vannerom has spent the last month in the Suffolk House of Correction at
South Bay awaiting deportation after her arrest in January by U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
Efforts
by her employers – two Hingham biotech executives whose twin sons
Vannerom cared for – to legally adopt her have failed, said Alicia
Secor, 43.
Secor and husband Jim McGorry, 49, hired Vannerom in 2004 and said she has become an integral part of their family.
“It’s
a shame. I can’t tell you how much we are going to miss her,” Secor
said. “I still feel in my heart of hearts there should be a legitimate
way for her to stay in the United States.”
The
Vannerom case has raised questions about how aggressively ICE should
target immigrants in the United States who hold down jobs, have no
criminal record and pay taxes, as Vannerom did.
Bush visits the New India
Stories highlighting President Bush’s visit to India
- Bush’s Visit Highlights India’s Growth
BusinessWeek via Yahoo! News – Wed, Mar 01, 2006 - What Bush wants in India
at Christian Science Monitor – Tue, Feb 28, 2006 - Bush Will Find Strong Backing in Passage to India
at The Los Angeles Times (reg. req’d) – Tue, Feb 28, 2006 - A Reversal of the Tide in India
at The Washington Post (reg. req’d) – Tue, Feb 28, 2006 - India and Outsourcing: Silicon Valley East
at MSNBC – Sun, Feb 26, 2006 - Rethinking India
at The Los Angeles Times (reg. req’d) – Wed, Mar 01, 2006 - Why Bush has to deliver in India
at Rediff (India) – Wed, Mar 01, 2006 - India seeking a friend, not a patron
at Asia Times Online – Wed, Mar 01, 2006 - Thank you, Mr President
at Rediff (India) – Wed, Mar 01, 2006 - President Bush Goes to India
at The New York Times (reg. req’d) – Tue, Feb 28, 2006
Outsourcing: Silicon Valley East
03/01/2006
Via Newsweek
Americans once feared their jobs would be shipped to India, but the backlash was overdone. Now everybody’s winning.
During the height of the dot-com boom, Dan Scheinman was one of Silicon
Valley’s most popular tech execs. As the chief of mergers and
acquisitions for Cisco Systems, he couldn’t go to a party without being
besieged by entrepreneurs eager to sell their business to the
deep-pocketed tech giant. Now Scheinman is once again the toast of
dinner parties, but he’s being pitched on new properties over tandoori
chicken and Darjeeling tea in Bangalore. For Cisco, India is the new
frontier, where it’s investing $1.2 billion to build a gleaming R&D
campus that will employ 3,000 people. “Bangalore feels like the center
of the technology world,” says Scheinman. “There’s a level of chaos,
energy and a sense that anything is possible.”
New IPC Report Reveals Voting Patterns Behind House’s Passage of Immigration Enforcement Bill
02/28/2006
Via AILA (The American Immigration Lawyers Association)
The Immigration Policy Center,
a division of AILF, AILA’s sister foundation, has released a new
report–“Playing Politics on Immigration”–showing that U.S.
Representatives with low numbers of undocumented immigrants residing in
their districts were most likely to support the Border Protection,
Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act (H.R. 4437), passed
by the House in December. IPC Research Fellow Rob Paral writes,
“Lawmakers whose constituents experience relatively little impact from
undocumented immigration have the luxury of playing politics on the
issue rather than confronting it directly.” View the full report.
Immigration issue key to business future
02/26/2006
Via MSNBC
Most everyone agrees that U.S. immigration policy is broken, but there’s a huge divide over how to fix it.
Millions of immigrants are in the country illegally, employers are
having trouble hiring the qualified workers they need from other
countries, and some lawmakers are concerned about the economic toll
illegal immigrants impose on the state’s education and health care
systems.
Those are just a few of the problems. But state and federal lawmakers
are proposing dozens of fixes, from clamping down on the country’s
borders to requiring employers to play a bigger role in verifying
workers’ legal status.
“There
is widespread agreement we have a problem,” said Rep. Paul Weissman,
D-Louisville, chairman of a state legislative committee that considered
10 proposed laws on immigration this week. “The disagreement is on the
solutions.”
Colorado
lawmakers debated 10 Republican measures Feb. 21 for more than seven
hours, hearing sometimes emotional testimony from private citizens,
employer groups, lawyers, activists and employees on both sides of the
proposals.
While
all but three bills were killed, the issue is likely to resurface later
this session and is almost certain to be a major issue in election
campaigns later this year. A group called Defend Colorado Now is
gathering signatures for a proposed ballot initiative that would amend
the Colorado constitution to deny non-emergency medical and other
services to illegal immigrants.
“The
public is frustrated, as we are, by the federal government’s inability
or unwillingness to fix this problem,” said House Speaker Andrew
Romanoff, D-Denver. “So people are turning, understandably, to other
levels of government.”
The
debate has big implications for employers and the economy. Immigrant
workers — legal and otherwise — play an important role in many
Colorado industries, including tourism, retail, construction and
technology. One in seven U.S. workers is an immigrant, according to the
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), which is based in
Denver.
Experts Say US Immigration Policies Keep Foreign Students, Workers Away
Washington
24 February 2006
Via VOA News
Some lawyers and educators are calling for
changes in U.S. immigration policies. They say current rules are too
restrictive and discourage talented people from around the world from
coming to the United States to study, teach and work. They worry that
many of them will go to other countries instead, diminishing the United
States’ ability to compete in many fields.
The United States is a nation built and sustained
by its immigrants. But some experts worry that increasingly tough
immigration laws in a post-September 11, 2001 world are limiting the
flow of highly skilled people into this country.
They say there is a need for comprehensive reform of these laws so
that immigration will once again become a positive force in U.S.
competitiveness. Michael Greco, the president of the American Bar
Association (lawyers), and himself an immigrant, says the current
system is failing to meet the needs of the nation. “Our laws and
attitudes on immigration have been almost schizophrenic. At times we
have thrown open our nation’s doors virtually without limit; at other
times we have tried vainly to build walls – legal and physical. Today
our laws reflect that confusion,” he said.
Panelists at a discussion of U.S. immigration policies Thursday in
Washington said there are too many examples of talented students being
denied visas to the United States because of overly restrictive laws
and polices. They warn this puts the United States at a serious
competitive disadvantage in the world economy.
Debra Stewart heads the Council of Graduate Schools. She says
applications from foreign students for masters and doctoral level
studies at U.S. universities have dropped off by nearly half since the
September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. She says the U.S.’s
competitive advantage which it has had since World War II is in
jeopardy of slipping away.
“Declines of this magnitude raise very serious questions of whether
America would even be able to continue its position of thought
leadership in the world given the intimate relationship between
graduate education and research as key drivers of the American economy,
of innovation, and of prosperity,” she said.
The experts attribute the overall decline to several factors,
including real and perceived difficulties in obtaining student visas,
rising U.S. tuition costs, recruitment activities by other
English-speaking nations and perceptions abroad that it is more
difficult for international students to come to the United States.
Bill Wulf is the president of the National Academy of Engineering.
He says over the last century immigrants have made some of the most
important contributions to the fields of science and engineering in the
United States, and their contributions continue to be vital.
“Between 1990 and 2004 over one-third of Nobel prizes awarded to
Americans were to foreign-born Americans. It’s clear we’ve been
skimming the best and brightest from around the world and prospering
because of it. We need these new Americans even more now as other
countries become more technologically capable, as they emulate the U.S.
model for prosperity,” he said.
In addition to the decline of foreign student enrollments at
universities, the number of foreign workers with specialized skills is
also dropping.
Immigration lawyer Daryl Buffenstein says getting visas for
high-skilled workers is very difficult. Some visas take many months,
others take years. He says Americans lose when they have to send jobs
overseas because they cannot bring the specialists to the United
States. “If we can’t get the technology to where the manufacturing is,
we must take the manufacturing to where the technology is,” he said.
The experts argue that real security and prosperity come from a
balance of keeping out those who will do harm, and welcoming those that
do us good. With selected thoughtful changes to US policy, they say,
the U.S. could achieve both
An Open Letter To USCIS Ombudsman Prakash Khatri: AC21 In Court
Julie Soininen’s open letter to Mr. Prakash Khatri, Ombudsman, USCIS requesting clarification of AC21.
H-1B Portability and Travel under AC21
I often receive questions concerning whether travel abroad is possible based on the previously stamped H-1B visa (with unexpired dates) through a former employer. The legacy INS
Memorandum from Michael A. Pearson, Executive Assoc. Comm’r, Office of Field
Operations (January 29, 2001) states
that an H-1B beneficiary is admissible at a port of entry even if he or she is
no longer working for the original petitioner, provided that the following
conditions are met:
1. The applicant is otherwise
admissible;
2. The applicant, unless exempt under
8 CFR §212.1, §1212.1, is in possession of a valid, unexpired passport and visa
(including a valid, unexpired visa endorsed with the name of the original
petitioner);
3. The applicant establishes to the
satisfaction of the inspecting officer that he or she was previously admitted as
an H-1B or otherwise accorded H-1B status. If a visa exempt applicant is not in
possession of the previously issued Form I-94, Arrival/Departure Record, or a
copy of the previously issued I-94, the applicant may present a copy of the Form
I-797, Notice of Action, with the original petition’s validity dates; and
4. The applicant presents evidence
that the new petition was filed timely with the Service Center, in the form of a
dated filing receipt, Form I-797, or other credible evidence of timely filing.
In order to be a timely filing, the petition must have been filed prior to the
expiration of the H-1B’s previous period of admission. The burden of proof is on
the applicant to show that he or she is admissible as an H-1B and eligible for
visa portability provisions described in AC21. Please ensure that you collect all proper documentation prior to utilizing this process. In addition, you should obtain a letter from your current employer certifying that they are aware of your trip. If possible, consult an attorney for details concerning your specific case.
Do Not Lose Your H-1B Over Wage Issues
many guest workers the H-1B status is an excellent opportunity to work
and remain in the U.S. while a green card is processing.When the USCIS
grants a worker H-1B status, it places certain obligations, that if not
kept, may jeopardize the worker’s ability to extend the status or even
obtain the green card.
The
most serious and draconian obligation is for the worker to receive the
wage listed on the petition. The CIS has interpreted immigration law in
such a way that it finds the H-1B employee is in violation of H-1B
status if the employee does not at least receive the wage listed on the
petition.The CIS maintains that the employee, who is receiving lower
than the required wage, has the obligation to file a formal complaint
with the employer and even the Department of Labor.If the H-1B employee
takes no steps to try and receive the required wage, the CIS finds that
this worker is not maintaining status and therefore cannot obtain an
extension of status.If the failure to maintain status reaches 180 days,
the person also generally becomes ineligible to adjust status to a
green card holder.
This is a very harsh interpretation by the CIS and
does not take into consideration that the employer is the one filing
the petition or that the employer exercises a much higher bargaining
power.It is unrealistic to expect a worker to challenge his employer
over a wage received for fear the worker may wind up terminated.But,
the CIS is unsympathetic and states that if the worker is terminated,
so be it.CIS’s position is that U.S. labor laws can protect this
employee.This policy fails to take into account the great time and
expense it takes to pursue labor law relief through the Department of
Labor and the courts.The CIS has stated that H-1B employees who show
that they have made an effort to correct wage issues from the beginning
can receive a favorable exercise of discretion and may change H-1B
employers and extend H-1B status.
The immigration bar disagrees with the CIS’s analysis
that penalizes a worker who is not receiving the required wage.But
until the CIS is challenged in Federal Court, its interpretation will
control.Practitioners have recently seen an alarming new trend coming
out of the CIS in H-1B extensions where the worker has not received the
proper wage.The CIS is deciding that since the employer did not pay the
wage in the first H-1B, it does not intend to pay the wage in the
extension. So, the filing of the extension is deemed to be fraudulent
and must be denied.This is particularly onerous for the worker because
when a petition is denied on the basis of fraud, the worker is also
deemed to have been out of status on the date his I-94 card expired.If
the worker has 180 days or more out of status, this triggers a
3-year-bar to reentering the U.S.Since many CIS offices take 180 days
or more to decide a case, this places many workers at risk for harsh
and unwarranted punishment by the CIS.
There are a myriad of legitimate reasons that a
worker does not receive the wages listed on the petition.The most
common is the employer’s need for the position is reduced from
full-time to part-time.In this type of situation the employer should
immediately file an amendment to show the position’s hours have been
reduced.Employers should not wait until it is time to file the
extension to inform the CIS.And despite contrary belief, one can be
petitioned for part-time H-1B employment.
Because the CIS treats the non-receipt of the proper
wages so harshly, it is very important for H-1B employees to regularly
check their wage statements and confirm that they are receiving the
correct wage.If they are not, they should immediately contact an
immigration practitioner to advise them on what steps need to be taken
to preserve their H-1B status.The problem should not be ignored because
it will not just go away.Failure to address it straight on can result
in the permanent loss of H-1B status (either with the same employer or
a new employer), triggering of 3 and 10-year-bars, and loss of the
ability to adjust status to a permanent resident.The solution may be as
simple as filing an H-1B amendment, or as complex as contesting the
wage with the employer and perhaps even the Department of Labor.This
can be a delicate situation and should only be entrusted to those who
have the experience to handle it properly.

Comment on India’s The Economic Times Article Titled — “Worried about H-1B visa? Take the L1 route”
I recently came across an article by “An Immigration Lawyer From Mumbai” in India’s The Economic Times (Online Edition). The article is titled “Worried about H-1B visa? Take the L1 route”. The author writes passionately regarding the L-1B visa; by way of background, this is a visa that in limited instances is a good replacement for the H-1B. The article, however, paints an incomplete portrait.
The author neglects to mention the two most basic and substantial obstacles which stand in the way of L-1B visa aspirants and their sponsors: 1) the L-1B visa holder cannot be ‘body-shopped’ and 2) the visa holder must possess ‘specialized knowledge’ which is defined as “special knowledge possessed by an individual
of the petitioning organization’s product, service,
research, equipment, techniques, management, or other interests
and its application in international markets, or an advanced
level of knowledge or expertise in the organization’s
processes and procedures.” This is obviously a difficult burden to bear during processing, especially in heavy traffic consulates such as Chennai or New Delhi. Requirements such as these unfortunately preclude a great majority of the software consulting companies that place workers at third-party job sites from sponsoring these visas.
Cases such as the Matter of Colley, Matter of Penner,
and Matter of Sandoz Crop Protection Corporation stated that the beneficiary
of an L-1B petition must possess proprietary or unique knowledge.
In these cases, a beneficiary would qualify only where their employers were using unique or specially patented
software or equipment not used by other employers in the
same industry. For example, a beneficiary proficient in
using software developed by his or her employer would qualify
for L-1B status, but a beneficiary with expertise in highly
sophisticated software developed by another company would
not qualify.