E Visa Consular Processing in Italy
Via AILA
The Department of State informed AILA’s DOS Liaison Committee that consular posts in Italy have decided to consolidate E visa processing in Rome and Milan, effective Jan 1, 2007. E visa applicants in the Florence and Naples consular districts will be asked to apply in Rome, but may also apply in Milan providing they are residents, or are physically present in Italy.
Hoax Web site jabs anti-illegal immigrant U.S. town
Via Reuters UK
By Jon Hurdle
PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) – Santa isn’t welcome in Hazleton
because he’s an illegal immigrant just like all the others the
Pennsylvania town is trying to get rid of — or so someone
would have you believe.
A new Web site, http://www.nosantaforhazleton.com, says the
town intends to keep Santa out this Christmas because he
represents the illegal immigration the town council believes
increases crime and burdens local services.
But the site is a hoax, created by someone in a bid to
satirize a local law passed in July that has attracted national
attention by imposing penalties on businesses and landlords to
deter them from hiring or renting rooms to illegal immigrants.
Important USCIS Memo Clarifies Periods of Admission for H and L Nonimmigrants
Via AILA
12/21/2006
A December 5, 2006 memo from Michael Aytes, USCIS Associate Director, Domestic Operations, provides guidance on the period of admission for H-4s and L-2s, applicants for H-1B status beyond the six-year maximum, and for H-1Bs who have been out of the U.S. for more than 1 year, but were not in H-1B status for a full 6 years. The memo clarifies that time spent in H-4 or L-2 status does not count against the maximum allowable period of stay available to principals in H-1B and L-1 status, and that qualifying H-1B aliens need not be in H-1B status when requesting an extension beyond the six-year maximum. Revisions to Chapters 31.2(d), 31.3(g) and 32.6 of the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM Update 06-29) are included in the memo.
16 Charged with Concealing Bosnian Serb Military Service When Entering U.S.
|
VIA Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Website WASHINGTON— The defendants allegedly committed immigration fraud and/or made In the past week, special ICE agents arrested 13 of the defendants According to indictments and criminal complaints filed in the Middle “Since its founding, the United States has attracted refugees All but one of the defendants face criminal charges that include “These cases demonstrate our resolve to identify and prosecute those Special ICE agents investigated these cases with assistance from the The indictments and criminal complaints filed in these cases contain The defendants are as follows: Middle District of Florida Sekula Bilic, indicted on one count of immigration fraud and one count of making false statements. Zdravko Kordic, indicted on one count of immigration fraud. Branko Popic, indicted on one count of immigration fraud and one count of making false statements. Ostoja Saric, indicted on one count of immigration fraud and one count of making false statements. Strahinja Krsmanovic, indicted on one count of immigration fraud. Boro Stojanovic, indicted on one count of immigration fraud. Jadranko Gostic, indicted on one count of unlawful procurement of citizenship and one count of making false statements. Zoran Radic, indicted on one count of immigration fraud and making false statements. Radic remains at large. Dusan Bosnjak, indicted on one count of immigration fraud and making false statements. Bosnjak remains at large. Bogdan Panic, indicted on one count of naturalization fraud and making false statements. Panic remains at large. Eastern District of Wisconsin Nedjo Ikonic, charged with one count of immigration fraud. Middle District of North Carolina Milivoje Jankovic, indicted on two counts of immigration fraud and two counts of making false statements. Veselin Vidacak, indicted on two counts of immigration fraud and two counts of making false statements. District of Colorado Milisav Vukovic, charged with one count of false statements. Eastern District of Michigan Nedjo Lojpur, indicted on two counts of immigration fraud. Northern District of Ohio Ratko Maslenjak, charged with one count of immigration fraud. |
|
— ICE — |
ICE Raid Protests Get Heated
Via KTTC
12/18/2006
AUSTIN, MN — Recent federal raids of undocumented workers across the country sparks a loud reaction in Austin.
Protesters for and against the recent ICE raids congregated on Main Street in Austin. Many began their trek with a prayer.
“The idea that these raids are going on because of identity theft is a
bogus cover story,” said Peter Brown, from the National Lawyers Guild.
According to Brown, an immigration attorney, 230 people were arrested
in Worthington last week and none of them were charged with identity
theft.
American visas to Indians set to zoom
Via rediff News
December 18, 2006 10:22 IST
With Indo-US bonhomie at its best, the United States is all set to
grant entry visas to a record number of Indians in the months to come.
In
September and October this year, the first two months of the US fiscal,
the US has issued 78 per cent more visas to Indians than in the same
two months of last year. In fact, the US consular operations have had
to requisition staff from all over the world to cope with the
additional work.
Indians have bagged no less than 30 per cent of
the visas granted by the US worldwide for skilled temporary workers.
Last fiscal, over 127,000 such visas were issued to Indians. And at
over 80,000, India has the largest number of foreign students in the
US. In fiscal 2006, 24,622 Indian students got a US visa — a 32 per
cent increase over the previous year.
The US issued 358,734
temporary visas in fiscal 2006, up 14 per cent from 313,800 in the
previous year. This was in addition over 30,000 immigrant visas. India
is now second only to Mexico among all countries for visa demand.
It
all began in September this year, when David Mulford, the US ambassador
to India, made a commitment to eliminate the visa backlog at the
earliest, keeping with the US policy of ‘Secure Borders, Open Doors.’
By
May 2007, the US is planning to achieve equilibrium between visa demand
and processing facility in India. Thus, a new US consulate general
building in Mumbai will be ready by 2008. The investment: a cool $100
million.
Another $20 million renovation at Delhi will see 10 new
visa interviewing windows. Hyderabad will have a 15-window consular
operation by 2008. While the Kolkata workspace will be doubled in 12
months, six additional interviewing windows are planned in Chennai this
year.
Naturally, airlines are falling over each other to get a piece of the action.
The
traffic between India and the US was 2.1 million passengers in 2005-06;
it is projected to rise by at least 15 per cent in the current year.
The average load factor on Air-India’s 28 weekly flights to the US is
as high as 85 per cent.
Several airlines, including state-owned
Air-India and American Airlines, are planning to start non-stop flights
between India and the US. Jet Airways plans to get into the market by
August 2007, while Kingfisher is working on its local feeder network
for its US operations, which it hopes to begin some time in 2008.
“Immigration Consultant” nonlawyer files frivolous case, has her clients deported
Via SignonSandiego.com
12/18/2006
Yet another story of an “Immigration Consultant” nonlawyer who took enormous sums of money from her clients and ultimately had them deported from the US due to her incompetence. I always caution my clients to avoid ‘notario’ nonlawyers who guarantee results; they are not licensed to practice Immigration law, and generally have no idea what they are doing.
2008 Diversity Visa Lottery Registrations
Over 6.4 million entries for the 2008
Diversity Visa Lottery were received during the two-month electronic
registration period, from October 4, 2006, through December 3, 2006.
This is an increase from the more than 5.5 million applications
received in the 2007 Diversity Visa Lottery. Taking into account
dependents, there are more than 10 million participants in the 2008
Diversity Visa Lottery.
Most of the applications
were from Africa and Asia with 41 percent of the total from Africa, 38
percent from Asia, 19 percent coming from Europe, and 2 percent coming
from South America, Central America, and the Caribbean. The largest
number of applicants came from Bangladesh (more than 1.7 million
applicants) followed by Nigeria (684,735) and Ukraine (619,584). The
number of winning entries by country will be available after the random
lottery process is conducted next year.
The electronic registration
process makes it easier for applicants to apply and continues to
increase the Department’s ability to screen against duplicate and other
fraudulent entries. Anti-fraud technology using facial recognition and
data mining will be used to eliminate duplicate cases.
Winners will be notified with
a letter mailed from the Kentucky Consular Center confirming the name,
date of birth, and country of chargeability for the registrant, as well
as a time/date stamp when entries were registered. Notification will be
sent to the winning entrants by mail only between April and July 2007
and will provide further instructions, including information on fees
connected with immigration to the United States.
There have been several
attempts to defraud Diversity Visa Lottery entrants. Lottery entrants
selected as winners in the Diversity Visa random drawing are notified
only by the Department of State’s Kentucky Consular Center. No other
organization or company is authorized by the Department of State to
contact winning entrants.
2006/1121
Released on December 15, 2006
Immigrants Help U.S. Business; H-1B Cap a Threat
By RICHARD SPRINGER
Via India-West Staff Reporter
Immigrants in the U.S. from 1990-2005 founded 25 percent of all public
venture-backed companies and about 40 percent of the high-technology
start-ups operating today, according to a study issued recently by the
Arlington, Va.-based National Venture Capital Association.
Immigrant-founded or co-founded companies achieved a market capitalization of more than $500 billion in the 15-year period.
Immigration: U.S. Entry Process Considered The “World’s Worst”
WASHINGTON,
DC, Weds. Nov. 29, 2006: The U.S. ranks with Africa and the Middle East
when it comes to travel paperwork and rude immigration officials.
That’s
the word from the Discover America Partnership, which recently
commissioned a study of more than 2,000 travelers worldwide to gauge
perceptions of the U.S. visa and entry process.
Pollsters claim that the U.S. entry process was thought to be the “world’s worst” by travelers and that 54
percent of international travelers said that immigration officials are
rude. Two-thirds also surveyed fear they will be detained at the border
because of a simple mistake or misstatement.
The
study also found that by deterring visitors, the U.S. is missing an
enormous economic and diplomatic opportunity since U.S. entry process
has created a climate of fear and frustration that is turning away
foreign business and leisure travelers from visiting and damaging
America’s image abroad.
“This
study should be a wake-up call for the U.S. government,” said Geoff
Freeman, executive director of the Discover America Partnership.
“Visiting the United States and interacting with the American people
can have a powerful, positive effect on how non-U.S. residents see our
country. Unfortunately, perceptions of a ‘rude’ and ‘arrogant’ entry
process are turning away travelers and harming America’s image.”
The
study was conducted by the independent polling firm RT Strategies
between October 25th and November 9th, 2006. Two-thousand and eleven
non-U.S. resident international travelers were surveyed, representing
15 plus countries worldwide. Half of those travelers had visited the
U.S. since September 11, 2001 while the other half had not visited the
U.S. since September 11, 2001. The Discover America Partnership was
launched in September, 2006 by some of America’s foremost business
leaders. – Hardbeatnews.com
VISA BULLETIN FOR JANUARY 2007
Visa Bulletin
Number 101
Volume VIII
Washington, D.C.
VISA BULLETIN FOR JANUARY 2007
A. STATUTORY NUMBERS
1.
This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during
January. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of
State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas;
the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of
Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status.
Allocations were made, to the extent possible under the numerical
limitations, for the demand received by December 7th in the
chronological order of the reported priority dates. If the demand could
not be satisfied within the statutory or regulatory limits, the
category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed
oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the
priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within
the numerical limits.
Only
applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may
be allotted a number. Immediately that it becomes necessary during the
monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental
requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls
within the new cut-off date.
2.
Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual
minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide
level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least
140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for
preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored
and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent
area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.
3. Section 203 of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of immigrant visas as follows:
FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES
First: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.
Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent
Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, and any unused
first preference numbers:
A. Spouses and Children: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;
B. Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older): 23% of the overall second preference limitation.
Third: Married Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.
Fourth: Brothers and Sisters of Adult Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.
EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES
First: Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth
and fifth preferences.
Second:
Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of
Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference
level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.
Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first
and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to “Other Workers”.
Schedule
A Workers: Employment First, Second, and Third preference Schedule A
applicants are entitled to up to 50,000 “recaptured” numbers.
Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.
Fifth:
Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000
of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or
high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional
centers by Sec. 610 of P.L. 102-395.
4.
INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based
preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which
a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides
that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the
same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or
following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of
Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent
area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions
apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas:
CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.
5.
On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that
the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); “C” means current, i.e.,
numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and “U” means
unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are
available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the
cut-off date listed below.)
| Fam-ily | All Charge- ability Areas Except Those Listed | CHINA-mainland born | INDIA | MEXICO | PHILIPP-INES |
| 1st | 22APR01 | 22APR01 | 22APR01 | 01JAN94 | 15DEC91 |
| 2A | 15MAR02 | 15MAR02 | 15MAR02 | 15MAR00 | 15MAR02 |
| 2B | 08APR97 | 08APR97 | 08APR97 | 01MAR92 | 08SEP96 |
| 3rd | 01JAN99 | 01JAN99 | 01JAN99 | 01JAN95 | 08FEB91 |
| 4th | 08JAN96 | 22JUN95 | 01OCT95 | 22JAN94 | 01JUL84 |
*NOTE:
For January, 2A numbers EXEMPT from per-country limit are available to
applicants from all countries with priority dates earlier than 15MAR00.
2A numbers SUBJECT to per-country limit are available to applicants
chargeable to all countries EXCEPT MEXICO with priority dates beginning
15MAR00 and earlier than 15MAR02. (All 2A numbers provided for MEXICO
are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no 2A numbers for
MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)
|
All |
CHINA- mainland born |
INDIA | MEXICO | PHILIP-PINES | |
| Employ-ment -Based |
|||||
| 1st | C | C | C | C | C |
| 2nd | C | 22APR05 | 08JAN03 | C | C |
| 3rd | 01AUG02 | 01AUG02 | 08MAY01 | 15MAY01 | 01AUG02 |
| Schedule A Workers |
15JUN04 | 15JUN04 | 15JUN04 | 15JUN04 | 15JUN04 |
| Other Workers |
01OCT01 | 01OCT01 | 01OCT01 | 01OCT01 | 01OCT01 |
| 4th | C | C | C | C | C |
| Certain Religious Workers | C | C | C | C | C |
| Iraqi & Afghani Translators | 18SEP06 | 18SEP06 | 18SEP06 | 18SEP06 | 18SEP06 |
| 5th | C | C | C | C | C |
| Targeted Employ-ment Areas/ Regional Centers |
C | C | C | C | C |
The
Department of State has available a recorded message with visa
availability information which can be heard at: (area code 202)
663-1541. This recording will be updated in the middle of each month
with information on cut-off dates for the following month.
Employment
Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the NACARA,
as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105 – 139, provides that once the
Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached
the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November
19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be
reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year.
This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset
adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached
November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW
annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.
B. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY
Section
203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides a maximum of up
to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit immigration
opportunities for persons from countries other than the principal
sources of current immigration to the United States. The Nicaraguan and
Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November
1997 stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as
necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas
will be made available for use under the NACARA program. This reduction has resulted in the DV-2007 annual limit being reduced to 50,000.
DV visas are divided among six geographic regions. No one country can
receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any
one year.
For
January, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to
qualified DV-2007 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible
countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas
are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers
BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:
| Region | All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately | |
|---|---|---|
| AFRICA | 11,300 |
Except: |
| ASIA | 3,800 | |
| EUROPE | 9,900 | |
| NORTH AMERICA (BAHAMAS) | 7 | |
| OCEANIA | 460 | |
| SOUTH AMERICA, and the CARIBBEAN | 700 |
Entitlement
to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of
the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the
lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the
DV-2007 program ends as of September 30, 2007. DV visas may not be
issued to DV-2007 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and
children accompanying or following to join DV-2007 principals are only
entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2007. DV visa
availability through the very end of FY-2007 cannot be taken for
granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.
C. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN FEBRUARY
For
February, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to
qualified DV-2007 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible
countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas
are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers
BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:
| Region | All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately | |
|---|---|---|
| AFRICA | 11,850 |
Except: |
| ASIA | 3,800 | |
| EUROPE | 10,400 | |
| NORTH AMERICA (BAHAMAS) | 7 | |
| OCEANIA | 550 | |
| SOUTH AMERICA, and the CARIBBEAN | 825 |
D. SCHEDULE A WORKER VISA CATEGORY
A
small amount of Schedule A Worker numbers which had been provided to
consular offices for November use were returned unused after the end of
the month and thus became available for reallocation. All remaining
Schedule A Worker numbers have been made available to applicants whose
priority dates are within the January cut-off date (15JUN04). The
Schedule A Worker category will be removed from the listings beginning
with the February cut-off dates.
E. OTHER NOTES ON VISA AVAILABILITY
FAMILY:
Demand for numbers in the Mexico and Philippines Family Third
preference category has been very heavy during the first quarter. No
movement of those cut-off dates can be expected, and continued heavy
demand may require the retrogression of the dates at some point in the
future.
EMPLOYMENT:
Demand for numbers in the Employment Third “Other Workers” category, as
well as the China and India Employment Second preference categories,
has been escalating. No movement in those cut-off dates will be
possible until the current level of demand subsides.
F. OBTAINING THE MONTHLY VISA BULLETIN
The Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs offers the monthly “Visa Bulletin” on the INTERNET’S WORLDWIDE WEB. The
INTERNET Web address to access the Bulletin is:
From the home page, select the VISA section which contains the Visa Bulletin.
To
be placed on the Department of State’s E-mail subscription list for the
“Visa Bulletin”, please send an E-mail to the following E-mail address:
listserv@calist.state.gov
and in the message body type:
Subscribe Visa-Bulletin First name/Last name
(example: Subscribe Visa-Bulletin Sally Doe)
To be removed from the Department of State’s E-mail subscription list for the “Visa Bulletin”, send an e-mail message to the
following E-mail address :
listserv@calist.state.gov
and in the message body type: Signoff Visa-Bulletin
The
Department of State also has available a recorded message with visa
cut-off dates which can be heard at: (area code 202) 663-1541. The
recording is normally updated by the middle of each month with
information on cut-off dates for the following month.
Readers may submit questions regarding Visa Bulletin related items by E-mail at the following address:
VISABULLETIN@STATE.GOV
(This address cannot be used to subscribe to the Visa Bulletin.)
Department of State Publication 9514
CA/VO
ecember 7, 2006
`India should open up Govt. IT procurement’
Via The Hindu
Staff Correspondent
|
increase in H1B visas by the U.S. Govt. suggested
CHENNAI: If India needs to be a global player ITIF is a non-profit and non-partisan public “Indian government procurement market is not The weighted average tariff in India was 28 Quoting an AT Kearney’s Foreign Direct The manufacturing productivity in India and
Mr. Atkinson advocated an increase in H1B visas Mr. Atkinson said Russia and China were posing |

Tough choices face women separated from spouses by immigration law
By JUAN ANTONIO LIZAMA
Richmond Times-Dispatch
December 17, 2006
RICHMOND, Va. —
Whenever someone knocks on the door, Beatriz Marquez’s 2-year-old son gets excited.
“Daddy coming?” Anthony asks repeatedly in Spanish. “No, Daddy is working,” she tells him.
The
little boy has been waiting for his father to come home for more than
three months. The last time he saw Victor Orellana, he was in handcuffs
on his way to jail.
Orellana, 28, who was in the U.S.
illegally, was deported to El Salvador in October, a month and a half
after he was detained at his home in Henrico County by U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement agents.
During the most recent fiscal
year, 186,641 immigrants who were in the U.S. illegally were deported.
Of those, 1,576 lived in Virginia and the nation’s capital.
Marquez and her children are living the consequences of her husband’s deportation, and she is not alone.
A
Times-Dispatch reporter spoke with a handful of women in the Richmond
area–some of them in the country legally, others not _ whose husbands
have been deported recently. Their lives, and the lives of their
children, were turned upside down in a heartbeat.
Suddenly,
the women found themselves frantically trying to save their husbands
from deportation. Some had to move out of their homes because they
couldn’t work to pay the rent while caring for their children.
Continue reading