Archive | H-1B Visas RSS for this section

Guess Who’s Getting the Most Work Visas – Via BusinessWeek

Via BusinessWeek

Moira Herbst of BusinessWeek indicates that “Indian outsourcers accounted for nearly 80% of the visa petitions approved last year for the top 10 participants in the program.”  Also: “Infosys Technologies (INFY) and Wipro (WIT), both based in Bangalore, top the list of visa beneficiaries in 2007, with 4,559 and 2,567 approved visa petitions, respectively, according to data from the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services.”


Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) are critizing the program: “These numbers should send a red flag to every lawmaker that the H-1B visa program is not working as it was intended,” said Grassley in an e-mail.”

Perhaps these two believe that some sort of per-country limits (like for EB Green cards) should be placed on India, a reverse-affirmative action of sorts.

Read Article

H-1B visa shortage again


Via The Times of India

BANGALORE: Despite evidence of an impending recession in the US, there is expected to be a severe shortage once again of US visas for Indian IT professionals in the coming year.


April 1 is the date to begin filing H-1B cases (for entry into the US from October 1), and IT companies are already scurrying to put together all documents in the expectation that the entire H-1B quota will be exhausted on the very first day, as it did last year.

“The visa scenario is going to impact the industry adversely, says Ravi Prasad, resident partner and immigration expert in legal firm Jay Sagar Associates.

“The business volumes have gone up significantly, but the quota remains the same. This is going to be a major deterrent for the industry, as it’s tough to convince and retain clients without having some amount of physical support/presence at the clients’ premises,” Prasad adds

For the 58,200 H-1B quota, the US received 1,20,000 petitions on April 2, 2007, the first day the quota opened last year.

“Short of a miracle, we expect the same to happen this year, says Navneet S Chugh, attorney in The Chugh Firm.

“We can also reasonably expect that, like last year, this year there will be a lottery system to pick petitions for approval. So expect somewhere between 40 per cent to 50 per cent of a company’s filed petitions on April 1 to get approved.

It was widely expected last year that the US Congress would increase the H-1B quota to over a lakh. But that didn’t happen.

Several immigration bills have failed in the US House as well as the Senate. And now with the presidential election primaries underway, nobody expects US President George Bush or his Republican government to take up the matter.

Meanwhile, the demand for IT services has not faced a significant cut yet. So a visa shortage is inevitable.

“To overcome this problem, domestic companies are currently busy checking out alternative options like L visa (meant for intra-company transfer), J visa (for specialists/domain experts) and B (business) category visas, says Prasad.
Indians were 34,000 of the 58,200 H-1B recipients last year.

“We expect the number to go up slightly this year, Chugh says.

var RN = new String (Math.random());
var RNS = RN.substring (2,11);
var b2 = ”;
if (doweshowbellyad==1)
bellyad.innerHTML = b2;

Divine Intervention? Indians Seek Help From the ‘Visa God’

By VAUHINI VARA
The Wall Street Journal
December 31, 2007; Page A1


HYDERABAD, India — Lord Balaji is one of the most-worshiped local incarnations of the Hindu Lord Vishnu. His adherents flock to his many temples to pray for things like happiness, prosperity and fertility.


Lately, the deity has grown particularly popular at the once-quiet Chilkur Balaji temple here, where he goes by a new nickname: the Visa God. The temple draws 100,000 visitors a week, many of whom come to pray to Lord Balaji for visas to travel or move to the U.S. and other Western countries.

Continue reading

Top IT firms used only 14% of H-1B petitions in 2006: US study

Via The Hindu




The 10 most cited outsourcing firms are Wipro, Infosys, TCS, Satyam Computer, Patni Computer, Cognizant Tech Solutions US, HCL America, Deloitte and Touche LLP, Accenture, and MphasiS.






Moumita Bakshi Chatterjee



New Delhi, Dec. 16 Countering claims by some critics that Indian IT industry was depriving US firms of H-1B visas, the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) has said that the top 10 outsourcing entities that are cited most by critics — including Indian vendors like Wipro, Infosys, and TCS — used up less than 14 per cent of new H-1B petitions approved in 2006.


In its latest study titled ‘The impact of high-skill immigration restrictions on America’, NFAP, a non-profit policy research group, said that “in 2007, critics started arguing that most H-1B visas were used by companies headquartered in India and that this deprived US companies of the visas. However, the top 10 outsourcing companies cited most by the critics, used less than 14 per cent of the new H-1B petitions approved in 2006 for initial employment.” The “vast majority of H-1B visas go to US high-tech companies, financial institutions, and US Universities.”


NFAP pointed out that employers had snapped up all the H-1B visas the first day the applications were submitted in FY 2008, meaning that about 15,000 petitions used by the 10 companies had no major impact on the overall availability of H-1Bs. The list of 10 most cited outsourcing firms are Wipro, Infosys, TCS, Satyam Computer Services, Patni Computer Systems, Cognizant Tech Solutions US, HCL America, Deloitte and Touche LLP, Accenture, and MphasiS, according to NFAP.


When contacted, the NFAP Executive Director, Mr Stuart Anderson, told Business Line from Arlington, Virginia, that against the total visa pool (65,000 cap for H-1B visa; 20,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers with Master’s or higher level degree from US institution; and visas available for those working with varsities or research institutions), the companies together used only 14 per cent of the total available numbers.


Mr Anderson said H-1B cap needed to be hiked to reflect the market demand for skilled professionals. “Any new restriction on high-skill immigration will hurt the US industry, as much as Indian firms. For US firms, it means that either they would not be able to grow for the lack of skilled professionals or they would have to pursue offshore alternatives,” he added.

IT worker who became an H-1B activist ends his fight

Via Computerworld

John Bauman, who led the grass-roots group TORAW, says it’s disbanding due to dwindling funds and membership.

H-1B visa: US Senator questions federal entities




Via The Hindu
Move comes within 7 months of missive sent to Indian cos







Details have been sought of the number of H-1B visa workers employed by the NIH between January 2002 and now (both full and part time workers), the job titles under which H-1B visa workers were employed, and a description of the efforts the NIH made to hire domestic workers before seeking an H-1B workers.






Our Bureau



New Delhi, Dec. 25 Months after asking nine Indian IT firms to explain the use of H-1B visas, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley has now turned up the H-1B-heat on two US Government-backed entities — National Institutes of Health and Fannie Mae — that are among the top 200 users of these high-skilled visas.


The Senator — who serves as a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees US’ immigration and visa policies including the H-1B visa programme — has sought details of the number of H-1B visa workers employed by the NIH between January 2002 and now (both full and part-time workers), the job titles under which H-1B visa workers were employed, and a description of the efforts the NIH made to hire domestic workers before seeking an H-1B worker.


Citing US Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) data that showed the NIH to be among the top 100 H-1B employers in America, the Senator has also asked the two entities to give details of the expense incurred by them in the H-1B visa process, and the number of layoffs, by year since 2002.


“While the H-1B programme has served a valuable purpose in allowing companies to bring in temporary workers for high-skilled jobs, the US Congress has a responsibility to make sure that Americans are not overlooked in the process. I’m asking questions today to find out how many taxpayer dollars are being used to recruit foreign workers and how invested our Government-backed entities are in this visa programme,” Senator Grassley has said in the letter to the two entities.


The move comes within seven months of the Senator (along with Senator Richard Durbin) sending letters to nine Indian firms that were issued an estimated 20,000 of the 65,000 visas issued in 2006, asking for information on the utilisation of H-1B visas.

Republican Prez hopeful bats for raising H-1B quota

Via ReDiff.com
By Sridhar Krishnaswami

“A leading Republican Presidential hopeful has
thrown his weight behind the H-1B visa programme stressing that
bringing high skilled workers on a permanent basis to the US will be
beneficial to the economy.

Former Massachusetts Gover Mitt Romney
has said that while he is for increasing the quota for H-1B visa, a
majority of whose aspirants are Indians, the exact figures would depend
on a number of things including the strength of the US economy and the
implications for the local workforce.

“I like H-1B visas. I like
the idea of the best and brightest in the world coming here. I’d rather
have them come here permanently rather than come and go, but I believe
our visa programme is designed to help us solve gaps in our employment
pool,” he said in an interview to TechCrunch, a weblog dedicated to
profiling and reviewing new internet products and companies.

“Where
there are individuals who have skills that we do not have in abundance
here, I’d like to bring them here and contribute to our economy,” he
added.”

Continue reading

USCIS Publishes Final Rule on Travel for H and L Nonimmigrants


[Federal Register: November 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 211)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61791-61793]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01no07-1]

—————————————


Rules and Regulations


Federal Register


—————————————


This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.


The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week.


—————————————


[[Page 61791]]


DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY


U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services


8 CFR Part 245


[CIS No. 2420-07; Docket No. USCIS-2007-0047]


RIN 1615-AB62


Removal of Receipt Requirement for Certain H and L Adjustment Applicants Returning From a Trip Outside the United States


AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.


ACTION: Final rule.


—————————————


SUMMARY: This rule removes the requirement that certain H and L nonimmigrants returning to the United States following a trip abroad must present a receipt notice for their adjustment of status applications to avoid having such applications deemed abandoned. The purpose of this narrow change is to remove an unnecessary documentation requirement from the regulations that the Department of Homeland Security has determined causes an undue burden on H and L nonimmigrants.


DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective November 1, 2007.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Vernon, Regulations and Product Management Division, Domestic Operations, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 2034, Washington, DC 20529, telephone (202) 272-8350.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:


I. Background


Travel outside the United States for an alien who has filed Form I- 485, “Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status,” to obtain lawful permanent resident status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1255, may adversely affect that application unless the alien takes certain steps before the trip. Most applicants must obtain permission from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to travel prior to the trip, a process referred to as “advance parole.” See 8 CFR 212.5 (c) and (f). For these applicants, departing the United States without advance parole while their adjustment of status applications are pending results in automatic abandonment of the applications and constitutes grounds for denial. 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A) & (B).


However, some applicants do not need to obtain advance parole prior to departing from the United States. 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(C) & (D). These are applicants who are permitted by statute to maintain a nonimmigrant status while they seek to obtain permanent resident status. See INA section 214(h), 8 U.S.C. 1184(h). This rulemaking applies to such applicants with respect to two qualifying nonimmigrant classifications: H-1 and L-1 (including dependents, H-4 and L-2). See INA section 101(a)(15)(H) and (L), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H) and (L) (describing H and L nonimmigrant classifications); 8 CFR 214.2(h) and (l). Both nonimmigrant classifications are employment-based. H-1 nonimmigrants include the H-1B classification for “specialty occupation” workers and the H-1C classification for certain registered nurses. See 8 CFR 214.2(h)(1)(ii)(A) and (B). L-1 nonimmigrants include the L-1A classification for certain intracompany transferees who are managers or executives, and the L-1B classification for “specialized knowledge” workers. See 8 CFR 214.2(l)(ii)(A).


Under current regulations, adjustment of status applicants maintaining H or L nonimmigrant status who depart the United States will not be deemed to have abandoned their applications if they did not obtain advance parole prior to departure. However, upon return to the United States, they must demonstrate to the immigration officer at the port of entry that they:


Remain eligible for H-1/H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrant status;


Will resume employment with the same employer for which they had previously been authorized to work as an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant (not applicable to H-4 or L-2 nonimmigrants);


Are in possession of a valid H-1/H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrant visa (if a visa is required); and


Are in possession of the original receipt notice for the application for adjustment of status, Form I-797, “Notice of Action” (issued by USCIS).


See 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(C). Preserving the pendency of an adjustment of status application in this manner does not apply to H-1/ H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants who are under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings. In such cases, the Executive Office for Immigration Review of the Department of Justice has jurisdiction over the adjustment of status application and 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A) governs the effect of travel abroad on those applications.


Because of its varying workload, USCIS recognizes that it is not always able to ensure immediate issuance and mailing of Form I-797 receipt notices upon receipt of an adjustment of status application. At times, USCIS therefore may experience delays in processing and issuing the receipt. This situation places H-1B/H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants who are awaiting a Form I-797 receipt notice, but wish to travel outside the United States while their adjustment of status application is pending, in the difficult position of having to decide whether to cancel a planned trip or risk denial of the adjustment application as a result of the departure. Either option would result in hardship to the alien and his or her dependents that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) finds is unduly burdensome and unnecessary. This is because it renders otherwise qualifying adjustment applications abandoned notwithstanding the fact that the information provided by presentation of the receipt (evidence of filing of an adjustment application) is already available to DHS. An alien whose adjustment of status application is deemed abandoned for failing to present a Form I- 797 receipt notice upon readmission to the United States resulting in a denial of the application would be forced to incur the time and expense involved in filing a new adjustment application.


Section 214(h) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(h), establishing the H-1/ H-4 and


[[Page 61792]]


L-1/L-2 nonimmigrant’s ability to maintain nonimmigrant status while pursuing permanent resident status, is broad and places no documentary restrictions on such ability. Further, DHS has determined, in light of advances in database technology, that the removal of the Form I-797 receipt requirement will not have any adverse impact on its responsibilities to ensure control over aliens seeking admission to the United States. Such aliens must establish eligibility for admission, in any case, before DHS permits them to reenter the United States. In addition, DHS creates a record of its inspection of the alien, including the alien’s application for admission.


II. Regulatory Changes


This rule amends 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(C) to remove the requirement that an H-1/H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrant present an original of the Form I-797 receipt notice for a pending adjustment of status application upon readmission to the United States following a trip abroad in order to avoid abandonment of the adjustment of status application as a result of the departure. This rule makes no other changes to 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(C).


III. Rulemaking Requirements


DHS finds that this rule relates to internal agency management, procedure, and practice and therefore is exempt from the public comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). This rule does not alter substantive criteria by which USCIS will approve or deny applications or determine eligibility for any immigration benefit. Instead, this rule relieves a document presentation requirement for certain applicants for immigration benefits. Specifically, this rule removes the requirement that H-1/H-4 and L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants present a Form I-797 receipt notice for their adjustment of status applications upon readmission to the United States after a trip abroad in order to avoid having their applications abandoned. This document presentation requirement is unnecessary since it concerns information that is already available to DHS. This final rule merely eliminates an unnecessary burden on these arriving aliens and streamlines agency management of its processes. As a result, DHS is not required to provide the public with an opportunity to submit comments on the subject matter of this rule.


Moreover, DHS finds that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to make the rule effective upon publication in the Federal Register without prior notice and public comment on the grounds that delaying implementation of this rule to allow for public comment would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. As a result of USCIS’s July 17, 2007, announcement that it would accept employment- based Forms I-485 filed by aliens whose priority dates are current under Department of State Visa Bulletin No. 107, USCIS received an unprecedented volume of employment-based applications for adjustment of status, including those filed by H and L nonimmigrants. Because of the recent surge in such filings, it will take several weeks for USCIS to enter the necessary data and issue Form I-797 receipt notices for employment-based adjustment of status applications. Therefore, it is important for this rule to take effect as soon as possible to avoid undue hardship on applicants who may need travel outside the United States prior to receiving the receipt notice.


In addition, no substantive rights or obligations of the affected public are changed by this rule. DHS believes the public will welcome this change. The public needs no time to conform its conduct so as to avoid violation of these regulations because the rule relieves a requirement of the existing regulations. Further, this rule will have no adverse impact on DHS’ adjudicatory responsibilities or ability to track the foreign travel of affected persons since DHS already records the admission of all nonimigrants. For these reasons, this rule is effective immediately under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and (3).


This rule relates to internal agency management, and, therefore, is exempt from the provisions of Executive Order Nos. 12630, 12988, 13045, 13132, 13175, 13211, and 13272. This rule is not considered by DHS to be a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Further, this action is not a proposed rule requiring an initial or final regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. In addition, this rule is not subject to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. Ch. 17A, 25, or the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3501, note.


Finally, under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104- 13, all Departments are required to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), for review and approval, any reporting requirements inherent in a rule. This rule does not affect any information collections, reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act.


List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 245


Aliens, Immigration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.


Accordingly, part 245 of chapter 1 of title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:


PART 245–ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE


1. The authority citation for part 245 continues to read as follows:


Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1182, 1255; sec. 202, Pub. L. 105-100, 111 Stat. 2160, 2193; sec. 902, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681; 8 CFR part 2.


2. Section 245.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(C) as follows:


Sec. 245.2 Application.


(a) * * *


(4) * * *


(ii) * * *


(C) The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful H-1 or L-1 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien remains eligible for H or L status, is coming to resume employment with the same employer for whom he or she had previously been authorized to work as an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant, and, is in possession of a valid H or L visa (if required). The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful H-4 or L-2 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if the spouse or parent of such alien through whom the H-4 or L-2 status was obtained is maintaining H-1 or L-1 status and the alien remains otherwise eligible for H-4 or L-2 status, and, the alien is in possession of a valid H-4 or L-2 visa (if required). The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status, who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful K-3 or K-4 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien is in possession of a valid K-3 or K-4 visa and remains eligible for K-3 or K-4 status.


* * * * *


[[Page 61793]]

Dated: October 15, 2007.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-21506 Filed 10-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-10-P

High Drama Over Highly Skilled Workers

Via Businessweek
09/13/2007

“After failing over the summer to pass legislation that would overhaul
the rules for all kinds of immigrants, Congress is gearing up to take
on the narrower task of reforming immigration laws for highly skilled
workers. The effort is less politically charged than comprehensive
reform since it sets aside the contentious issue of what to do with the
estimated 12 million illegal immigrants
(BusinessWeek.com, 8/22/07) already in the U.S., and it appears likely
that some legislation will be passed. But there is opposition, and the
nature and degree of reform for the highly skilled remains unclear.”

Continue reading

Governors Send Letter Urging Congress To Raise H-1B Visa Cap

Via Informationweek

Thirteen Governors recently submitted a letter in a bipartisan attempt to urge Congress to raise the H-1B visa cap.  This year’s cap was woefully inadequate, as affected parties already know. 

Congress Pushes Back on H1-B Visas

Via ChannelInsider

The possibility of H-1B reform or relief seems to be unlikely, according
to this article.