U.S. Senators Near Compromise on Immigration

VIA REUTERS
03/17/2006

WASHINGTON — Under pressure to produce
broad immigration reform legislation by the end of the month, a U.S.
Senate panel on Thursday neared agreement on a proposal that would give
some of the 12 million illegal aliens living in the country an
opportunity to earn citizenship.

Although no vote will be held until after a weeklong
congressional recess, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday
appeared ready to back a proposal by panel member Sen. Edward Kennedy,
a Massachusetts Democrat, who has worked on the issue with his
Republican colleague John McCain of Arizona.

The panel, which is working on comprehensive immigration and
border security legislation, will also consider a related proposal that
would allow foreigners to enter the United States as legal guest
workers and then have a chance to earn permanent status.

Republicans are divided over immigration policy, and the
Judiciary Committee plan is likely to spark a firestorm from
conservatives who oppose regularizing the status of illegal immigrants,
saying they would be rewarded after breaking U.S. immigration law.

More than 70 members of the House of Representatives led by
Rep. Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican, fired off a letter to Senate
Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican,
saying measures the panel was considering “doom any chance of a real
reform bill reaching the president’s desk this year.”

But backers cite both economic and security reasons. They say
that providing a path to permanent residency and eventual citizenship
will avoid creating a permanent underclass of workers and help bring
illegal aliens out of the shadows.

Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican who opposes giving
permanent status to illegals, said after the meeting that the panel
would probably vote for the Kennedy plan.

“The votes are there,” Grassley said.

No Amnesty

Kennedy told the committee the proposal was not an amnesty. People
seeking legal status would have to pay a $2,000 fine, apply for a
six-year temporary status, have a job, pay taxes, learn English and
show an understanding of U.S. government.

They would not get permanent status faster than the 3 million foreigners awaiting legal entry, he said.

“There is no moving to the front of the line, there is no free ticket,” Kennedy said. “This is not amnesty.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, quipped that the requirements “probably exclude half of my family.”

The panel also reached tentative agreement on a guest-worker
program sought by President George W. Bush. U.S. business groups favor
creating a temporary-worker program to help fill jobs that Americans
either cannot or will not do. Both business and labor groups also favor
giving current undocumented workers a way to legalize their status.

Details will be worked out during the recess, panel members said.

The panel is working against a deadline set by Majority Leader
Bill Frist. The Tennessee Republican, and possible contender in the
2008 presidential race, said the Senate will take up a bill addressing
only enforcement and border security when lawmakers return on March 27.
But Frist told reporters if the Judiciary Committee approves a
comprehensive bill, it would be considered by the Senate.

“I am committed to border security, interior enforcement and addressing the temporary-worker program,” Frist said.

Whether Congress will finalize immigration legislation before
the November congressional elections is unclear. Both Democrats and
Republicans are likely to use the issue to gain advantage.

The House of Representatives has voted for tough border
security and enforcement legislation with no guest-worker program. The
two sides would have to work out their differences before a bill could
be sent to Bush for his signature.

Wire firm a force in debate over immigration

VIA AZCENTRAL.COM
Mar. 19, 2006 12:00 AM MEXICO
CITY

– Every two weeks, Nayeli Toxqui pushes her baby stroller down
Insurgentes Avenue, past the whizzing taxis and the wheezing buses, and
joins a line of people near a yellow-and-black Western Union sign.

“I’m picking up money from my husband in Chicago,” she said one recent
morning, peering at the cashier’s booth dispensing money at the back of
the Elektra appliance store. “I don’t work, so you could say I depend
on la Western.”

So do millions of other families and their migrant relatives. And in
turn, Western Union depends on them, as it rides a 10-year wave of
immigration to record-high profits.

So perhaps it is no surprise that the world’s biggest money-transfer
company and its parent firm, First Data Corp., are quietly becoming a
force in the debate over illegal immigration and border security.

In recent years, Denver-based First Data has openly campaigned for
immigration reform, which could legalize millions of undocumented
workers, and has created a $10 million “Empowerment Fund” for the same
purpose.

Click to continue reading story

Mexican Ads Push Immigration Reform

VIA CBSNEWS.COM

(AP) Mexico
published advertisements in major newspapers in Mexico and in the
United States on Monday saying migrants should have the same rights as
everyone else and calling it “indispensable” that the two countries
reach a migration accord.

Published in English in The New York Times, The Washington Post and
the Los Angeles Times, and in Spanish in leading Mexico City
newspapers, the full-page ads coincide with expected U.S. Senate debate
on a bill that would extend fences along the U.S.-Mexico border crack
down on illegal immigration with law enforcement and the military.

“Acknowledging the sovereign right of each country to regulate the
entrance of foreigners, it is indispensable to find a solution for the
undocumented population that lives in the United States and contributes
to the development of the country, so that people can be fully
incorporated into their actual communities, with the same rights and
duties,” the ad read.

The ad’s content was taken primarily from a report outlining the
goals and recommendations of a committee of Mexican legislators,
executive branch officials, diplomats, academics, foreign policy
experts and social group leaders.

The ad states that Mexico wants “a far-reaching guest workers
scheme” and that “in order for a guest workers program to be viable,
Mexico should participate in its design, management, supervision and
evaluation.”

Click to continue reading story

A guide to locating & FAQ regarding designated Civil Surgeons


Most
applicants for adjustment of status are required to have a medical
examination. The medical examination must be conducted by a civil
surgeon who has been designated by the Bureau of Citizenship and
Immigration Services. Medical examinations are needed for adjustment of
status cases (Form I-485) and requests for V nonimmigrant status (Form
I-539). If you are applying for a visa outside of the United States,
you should review our Medical Examination page below.


Use the links below to access additional information:

Medical Examinations (Vaccinations, Civil Surgeons, Panel Physicians, Forms and Medical Waivers)

Frequently Asked Questions for Form I-693, Medical Examination of Aliens Seeking Adjustment of Status

Vaccination Requirements for Refugees and Asylees Applying for Adjustment of Status in the United States

Vaccination Requirements for Immigrant Visa Applicants and Adjustment of Status Applicants

Form I-693, Medical Examination of Aliens Seeking Adjustment of Status

Finding A Designated Civil Surgeon in Your Area

For the most current list of civil surgeons in your area, please check our Civil Surgeons Locator.
Or, you may call the National Customer Service Center at 1 (800)
375-5283. After you have selected English or Spanish as your language
of choice for the message, choose #2 for medical examinations from the
list of six automated options. You will be asked to key in your zip
code to help determine the list of designated civil surgeons close to
you. Have pencil and paper ready to record the names of the civil
surgeons provided.

Notice to Individuals Granted Immigration Benefits by Immigration Judge or Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

If you have been granted Lawful Permanent Resident or Asylum status during proceedings before an Immigration Judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and you have not yet received documentation of your status, please schedule an appointment
with your local USCIS office to get that documentation. You should be
prepared to bring with you a copy of the final order you received from
the Immigration Judge or the BIA and documents establishing your
identity (passport, driver’s license, USCIS issued employment
authorization document, etc.).

Inquiries from Lawful Permanent Residents Regarding Status Documentation:


If
you are a Lawful Permanent Resident who has attended all scheduled
USCIS appointments for documentation and complied with all USCIS
instructions, including biometrics collection, but you have not yet
received your status documentation and:

     (1) it has been 60 days or more since you attended your first USCIS appointment to request your documentation, and the order granting you permanent residence was issued before April 1, 2005; or

     (2)
it has been 30 days or more since you attended your first USCIS
appointment to request your documentation, and the order granting you
permanent residence was issued on or after April 1, 2005,

you may
send an e-mail inquiry to a USCIS national point of contact at
citrixeoir@dhs.gov or, if you cannot use e-mail, you may contact the
National Customer Service Center (NCSC) at 1-800-375-5283. In your
e-mail or phone inquiry, you must provide your name, A number, date of
birth, address, date of your order from the Immigration Judge or the
BIA, specific type of relief granted that made you a permanent resident
(e.g., adjustment of status, cancellation of removal), whether your
order is final (if you or your representative know), the USCIS district
or suboffice where you attended your appointment for documentation, the
dates of your InfoPass and ASC appointments, and any other relevant
information about your request for documentation. Without this
information, USCIS may not be able to respond fully to your inquiry.

Diversity Lottery 2007 has begun

The
Congressionally mandated Diversity Immigrant Visa Program makes
available 50,000 permanent resident visas annually, drawn from random
selection among all entries to persons who meet strict eligibility
requirements from countries with low rates of immigration to the United
States.

Please
Note: There have been instances of fraudulent websites posing as
official U.S. Government sites. Some companies posing as the U.S.
Government have sought money in order to “complete” lottery entry
forms. There is no charge to download and complete the Electronic
Diversity Visa Entry Form. The Department of State notifies successful
Diversity Visa applicants by letter, and NOT by email. To learn more
see the Department of State Warning and the Federal Trade Commission Warning.

As you apply to come to the U.S., please take a moment to visit our Rewards For Justice program website to see how you can help in the continuing efforts for “secure borders” and “open doors.”

Click on the links for information on the Diversity Visa Program.

2007 Diversity Visa Lottery Instructions
DV 2006 Results
List of Occupations
KCC Information

Diversity Visa Lottery 2006 (DV-2006) Results

The
Kentucky Consular Center in Williamsburg, Kentucky has registered and
notified the winners of the DV-2006 diversity lottery. The diversity
lottery was conducted under the terms of section 203(c) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act and makes available *50,000 permanent
resident visas annually to persons from countries with low rates of
immigration to the United States. Approximately 90,000 applicants have
been registered and notified and may now make an application for an
immigrant visa. Since it is likely that some of the first *50,000
persons registered will not pursue their cases to visa issuance, this
larger figure should insure that all DV-2006 numbers will be used
during fiscal year 2006 (October 1, 2005 until September 30, 2006).

Applicants
registered for the DV-2005 program were selected at random from over
6.3 million qualified entries received during the 60-day application
period that ran from 12:00 AM on November 5, 2004, until midnight,
January 7, 2005. The visas have been apportioned among six geographic
regions with a maximum of seven percent available to persons born in
any single country. During the visa interview, principal applicants
must provide proof of a high school education or its equivalent, or
show two years of work experience in an occupation that requires at
least two years of training or experience within the past five years.
Those selected will need to act on their immigrant visa applications
quickly. Applicants should follow the instructions in their
notification letter and must fully complete the information requested.

Registrants
living legally in the United States who wish to apply for adjustment of
their status must contact the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration
Services for information on the requirements and procedures. Once the
total *50,000 visa numbers have been used, the program for fiscal year
2006 will end. Selected applicants who do not receive visas by
September 30, 2006 will derive no further benefit from their DV-2006
registration. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following
to join DV-2006 principal applicants are only entitled to derivative
diversity visa status until September 30, 2006.

Only
participants in the DV-2006 program who were selected for further
processing have been notified. Those who have not received notification
were not selected. They may try for the upcoming DV-2007 lottery if
they wish. The dates for the registration period for the DV-2007
lottery program will be widely publicized during August 2005.

*
The Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by
Congress in November 1997 stipulated that up to 5,000 of the 55,000
annually-allocated diversity visas be made available for use under the
NACARA program. The reduction of the limit of available visas to 50,000
began with DV-2000.

The following is the statistical breakdown by foreign-state chargeability of those registered for the DV-2006 program:

AFRICA

ALGERIA

1,377

ERITREA

672

ANGOLA

21

ETHIOPIA

6,995

BENIN

328

GABON

26

BOTSWANA

11

GAMBIA, THE

127

BURKINA FASO

164

GHANA

 3,880

BURUNDI

60

GUINEA

 249

CAMEROON

1,639 

GUINEA-BISSAU

3

CAPE VERDE

2

KENYA

2,827

CENTRAL AFRICAN REP.

10

LESOTHO

0

CHAD

30

LIBERIA

695

COMOROS

3

LIBYA

51

CONGO

149

MADAGASCAR

22

CONGO, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE

665

MALAWI

27

COTE D’IVOIRE

374

MALI

99

DJIBOUTI

12

MAURITANIA

31

EGYPT

6,439

MAURITIUS

8

EQUATORIAL GUINEA

MOROCCO

5,980

NAMIBIA 5

MOZAMBIQUE

6  

NIGER

62

SOUTH AFRICA

311

NIGERIA

6,191

SUDAN

805

RWANDA

26

SWAZILAND

9

SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE

2

TANZANIA

251

SENEGAL

280

TOGO

2,138

SEYCHELLES

4

TUNISIA

122

SIERRA LEONE

555

UGANDA

190

SOMALIA

221

ZAMBIA

99

 

 

ZIMBABWE

157

 

ASIA

AFGHANISTAN

52

MALAYSIA

55

BAHRAIN

0

MALDIVES

0

BANGLADESH

5,456

MONGOLIA

 141

BHUTAN

3

NEPAL 

1,934

BRUNEI

1

NORTH KOREA

0

BURMA

659

OMAN 

3

CAMBODIA

107

QATAR

7

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMIN. REGION

83

SAUDI ARABIA

55

INDONESIA

263

SINGAPORE

40

IRAN

934

SRI LANKA

387

IRAQ

84

SYRIA

47

ISRAEL

116

THAILAND

76

JAPAN

336

TAIWAN

353

JORDAN

81

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

30

KUWAIT

15

YEMEN

47

LAOS

0

   

LEBANON

108

   

 

EUROPE

ALBANIA

2,504

GEORGIA

331

ANDORRA 

0

GERMANY

998

ARMENIA

757

GREECE

68

AUSTRIA

62

HUNGARY

152

AZERBAIJAN

196

ICELAND

13

BELARUS

698

IRELAND

145

BELGIUM

28

ITALY

210

BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA

70

KAZAKHSTAN 

244

BULGARIA

2,131

KYRGYZSTAN 

132

CROATIA

42

LATVIA

97

CYPRUS

18

LIECHTENSTEIN

0

CZECH REPUBLIC

104

LITHUANIA

488

DENMARK 

43

LUXEMBOURG

0

ESTONIA

44

MACEDONIA, FORMER YUGOSLAV REP. OF

202

FINLAND

61

MALTA

7

FRANCE

340

MOLDOVA

285

FRENCH POLYNESIA 

1

MONACO

1

MARTINIQUE

1

NETHERLANDS

105

REUNION

1

SLOVENIA

5

NETHERLANDS ANTILLES

8

SPAIN

61

NORTHERN IRELAND

63

SWEDEN

110

NORWAY

30

SWITZERLAND

139

POLAND

3,416

TAJIKISTAN

42

PORTUGAL

28

TURKEY

1,357

MACAU

5

TURKMENISTAN

76

ROMANIA

1,716

UKRAINE

5,269

SAN MARINO

0

UZBEKISTAN

1,346

SERBIA & MONTENEGRO

507

VATICAN CITY

0

SLOVAKIA

223

   

 

NORTH AMERICA

BAHAMAS, THE

12

 

 

 

OCEANIA

AUSTRALIA

837

NAURU

7

CHRISTMAS ISLANDS

4

NEW ZEALAND

292

FIJI

757

COOK ISLANDS

0

KIRIBATI

5

NIUE

5

MARSHALL ISLAND

0

PALAU

1

MICRONESIA, FEDERATED STATES OF

7

PAPUA NEW GUINEA 

10

SAMOA

11

TUVALU

8

SOLOMON ISLAND

0

VANUATU

0

TONGA

171

 

 

 

SOUTH AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICA, AND THE CARIBBEAN

ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA

1

DOMINICA

3

ARGENTINA

134

ECUADOR

285

BARBADOS

5

GRENADA

2

BELIZE

8

GUATEMALA

28

BOLIVIA

205

GUYANA

36

BRAZIL

377

HONDURAS

29

CHILE

35

NICARAGUA

32

COSTA RICA

34

PANAMA 

24

CUBA

584

PARAGUAY

6

PERU

2,197

SURINAME

4

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS

3

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

120

SAINT LUCIA 

2

URUGUAY

15

SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

3

VENEZUELA

266

Natives
of the following countries were not eligible to participate in DV-2006:
Canada, China (mainland-born, excluding Hong Kong S.A.R., and Taiwan),
Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Haiti, India, Jamaica,
Mexico, Pakistan, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom
(except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam.

NOTICE: Chennai Consulate announces changes to appointments for March 31st and April 6th.

Via The Chennai Consulate

Please
be advised that The American Consulate General in Chennai will be
closed for visa applications on March 31, 2006.  As result, all
applicants with appointments scheduled on that day are asked to come on
March 15, 2006 at the time noted on their original appointment notice.

Also
be advised that The American Consulate General in Chennai will be
closed on April 6, 2006.   April 6 is a gazetted holiday that was not
announced when April appointment dates were posted.  As result, all
applicants with appointments scheduled on that day are asked to come on
April 13, 2006 at the time noted on their original appointment notice.

VFS will notify individual applicants by e-mail or telephone.

If these dates are not convenient, please refer to the VFS website to reschedule your appointment.

The American Consulate General in Chennai apologies for any inconvenience these changes may cause.

Immigration bill would add visas for tech workers

Via The San Fransisco Chronical
Friday, March 10, 2006

Buried in the Senate’s giant immigration bill — hardly noticed amid a fierce
debate over a guest-worker program for unskilled laborers — are provisions that
would open the country’s doors to highly skilled immigrants for science, math,
technology and engineering jobs.

The provisions were sought by Silicon Valley tech companies and enjoy
significant bipartisan support amid concern that the United States might lose
its lead in technology. They would broaden avenues to legal immigration for
foreign tech workers and would put those with advanced degrees on an automatic
path to permanent residence should they want it.

The measures include nearly doubling the number of H-1B skilled-worker
temporary visas to 115,000 — with an option of raising the cap 20 percent more
each year. H-1B visas were highly controversial in the Bay Area when their
numbers reached a peak of 195,000 in 2003.

Congress had increased the visas during the late 1990s dot-com boom, when
Silicon Valley complained of tech-worker shortages, although native-born
engineers complained that their wages were undermined by cheap labor from India
and China.

With the tech crash and the revelation that some of the Sept. 11, 2001,
hijackers had entered the country on student visas, the political climate for
foreign workers darkened, and Congress quietly allowed the number of H-1B visas
to plummet back to 65,000 a year.

The cap was reached in August — in effect turning off the tap of the visas
for 14 months. A special exemption of 20,000 visas for workers with advanced
degrees was reached in January.

“We’re in a bad crunch right now,” said Laura Reiff, head of the Essential
Worker Immigration Coalition, a business umbrella group backing more
immigration. “We are totally jammed on immigrant visas, the green card category,
and totally jammed on H-1B visas. You can’t bring in tech workers right now.”

Alarm in Washington has shifted from student hijackers to U.S.
competitiveness. Indian and Chinese students face brighter prospects in their
own booming economies, and the fear now is that they no longer want to come to
the United States.

The new skilled immigration measures are part of a controversial 300-page
bill by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., now being
rewritten by the committee with the goal of reaching the Senate floor by the end
of the month.

Other provisions include a new F-4 visa category for students pursuing
advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics. These
students would be granted permanent residence if they find a job in their field
and pay a $1,000 fee toward scholarships and training of U.S. workers.

Labor certification rules also would be streamlined for foreigners holding
the desired advanced degrees from a U.S. university. Immigrants with advanced
degrees in the desired fields, as well as those of “extraordinary ability” and
“outstanding professors and researchers,” would also get an exemption from the
cap on employment-based green cards and slots for permanent residence.

“The U.S. is educating these people,” said Kara Calvert, director of
government relations for the Information Technology Industry Council, a tech
industry group. “This allows these students to remain in the U.S. and contribute
to the U.S. economy.”

The provisions for highly skilled workers enjoy support in both parties in
the Senate and in the Bush administration after a raft of high-profile studies
have warned that the United States is not producing enough math and science
students and is in danger of losing its global edge in innovation to India and
China.

Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy echoed many in the tech industry at a
conference in Washington on Wednesday when he warned that if skilled immigration
is not expanded, “There will be a great sucking sound of innovation out of the
U.S.”

Silicon Valley venture capitalist John Doerr suggested at a technology summit
last fall that the United States “should staple a green card to every kid, every
foreign national that graduates with a degree in engineering and science, so
that they stay here. Imagine innovation in America without Andy Grove, without
Jerry Yang, without Sergey Brin — Hungarian, Chinese, Russian. These immigrants
have contributed enormously to innovation and our well-being.”

But House Republicans are cool toward any increase in legal immigration,
including skilled workers, and are at sharp odds with the White House. They
passed a bill in December to crack down on border enforcement, calling for
construction of a 700-mile fence on the border with Mexico.

House Republicans omitted skilled immigration from their “Innovation and
Competitiveness Act,” released with much pomp last week, prompting House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, to blast the proposal as doing
nothing “to ensure that the best and brightest from around the world are able to
contribute to innovation in the United States.”

Click here to continue reading story

F-4 better deal for students from US

VIA THE TIMES NEWS NETWORK [TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2006 09:58:56 PM]

NEW DELHI: Going to the US is
set to become much simpler for students pursuing an advanced degree – master’s
or higher – in physical sciences, technology and engineering, thanks to the
introduction of a new category of student visa (F-4).

Senator Arlen Specter’s Immigration Reform Bill,
currently being discussed by the US Senate judiciary committee, proposes a new
category of student visa (F-4) for students pursuing higher studies in maths,
physical sciences, engineering and technology.

Senator Specter has some good news for all foreign
students, irrespective of the course of study. The Bill proposes to allow all
students on an F-4 visa to be eligible for off-campus employment, unrelated to
the field of study, if they maintain good academic standing and the employer
attests to the educational institution and the department of labour that it has
spent at least 21 days recruiting US citizens to fill the position and will pay
the greater of the actual or prevailing wage.

Click to continue reading story

Bush faces more trouble over immigration bill

Via The Washingtonpost.com
Tuesday, March 14, 2006; 2:34
PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President George W. Bush, whose administration
suffered a stinging setback over a Dubai company’s deal to operate some U.S.
port terminals, faces another brewing Republican revolt over immigration
reform.

With the full Senate due to take up the issue before the end of March,
Republicans are split over what to do about the estimated 12 million illegal
immigrants in the country. Whichever way they turn, some part of their governing
coalition will be furious, analysts said.

The issue could also antagonize Hispanic voters — a swing group Bush has
targeted as a source of Republican growth — before November elections in which
Democrats are seeking to regain control of Congress.

“I have seen virtually no agreement on anything when it comes to this
immigration bill. Emotions are running at an all-time high,” said Pennsylvania
Sen. Arlen Specter, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He spoke as
debate began in his committee on an ambitious overhaul of U.S. immigration
law.

Specter is pushing Bush’s proposal to create a guest-worker program for jobs
that Americans either cannot or will not do. The committee is also trying to
agree on a provision for illegal aliens to gain legal status.

That has angered a sizable anti-immigration wing in the Republican Party.
More than 90 House members, nearly all Republicans, have joined a caucus headed
by Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo, who has vowed to derail Bush’s guest-worker plan
and any legislation that smacks of what he calls “amnesty” for illegal
immigrants.

“There is a loud group of anti-immigration folks out there for whom this is
the main issue they care about. They make a lot of noise, send e-mails and write
and call their congressional representatives,” said John Gay of the National
Restaurant Association, which backs a guest-worker program and a way for illegal
immigrants to become legal.

“This issue splits both parties but it splits the Republicans more,” he
said.

In a debate roiled by charges of xenophobia and lax security, Republican
lawmakers broke with Bush this month and forced a Dubai company pull back from
its plans to acquire management of some terminal operations in six major U.S.
ports.

On immigration, Massachusetts Democrat Sen. Edward Kennedy has pushed for a
guest-worker program and a path for legalization, but many Democrats have been
content to watch the Republicans fight, said Steve Camarota of the Center for
Immigration Studies.

One Republican aide said the party needed a major accomplishment before the
November election. But others doubt an immigration overhaul can pass this year
because the issue is so divisive.

The House of Representatives, where anti-immigration sentiments are stronger
than in the Senate, passed a bill last December to tighten border security and
toughen enforcement against illegal immigrants.

Click to continue reading story